The fact that this is a repeatable testable experiment that shows that the basis for Behe’s irreducible complexity has been falsified since there is a natural explanation.
.No matter how many times you repeat “it is too complicated for me to understand, so that proves that God did it” is not and never will be science.
It seems that you failed to notice this little example of quote mining:
Neutral evolution falls outside the descriptions of Charles Darwin. But once the pieces gather, mutation and natural selection can take care of the rest, ultimately resulting in the now-complex form of TIM23.
Might I suggest that in addition to a much needed course in remedial science, you might want to include a class in reading comprehension?
==The fact that this is a repeatable testable experiment that shows that the basis for Behe’s irreducible complexity has been falsified since there is a natural explanation.
What repeatable, testable experiment would that be, Ira?
==It seems that you failed to notice this little example of quote mining
What quote mining would that be, Ira? The authors admit that neutral evolution falls outside of Darwinian selection, therefore there is absolutely nothing to guide it other than completely random mutations. It's the equivalent of saying that inanimate matter came together to create the first reproducing protocell. Such a process is equally outside the descriptions of Darwinian evolution (as you are so fond of reminding us).
