Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Holder dials back his commitment to pushing ban on assault weapons
The Hill ^ | November 11, 2009 | Sam Youngman

Posted on 11/16/2009 11:39:38 AM PST by yoe

Attorney General Eric Holder is retreating on his commitment to pursue a controversial gun-control measure.

Holder’s statements, recently delivered to senators in writing, clearly indicate the Obama administration is in no rush to reinstate the assault weapons ban, which expired in 2004.

In response to written questions from Senate Judiciary Committee members, Holder adopted a much different tone on the ban than he did in February, when he said, “As President Obama indicated during the campaign, there are just a few gun-related changes that we would like to make, and among them would be to reinstitute the ban on the sale of assault weapons.”

That comment attracted many headlines, but the nation’s chief law enforcement officer is now downplaying his earlier remarks.

Noting his February statements, Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) asked Holder, “Is it still your intent to seek a reinstitution of the ‘assault weapons’ ban?”

Holder stressed that he wasn’t breaking new ground earlier this year.

His response to a reporter in February, Holder claims, is not akin to “call[ing] for a new assault weapons ban, but rather restating the previously expressed campaign position on this issue.”

Regarding the administration’s next step, Holder stated, "The department is currently reviewing existing gun laws to determine how best to combat gun violence and keep guns out of the hands of criminals and others prohibited from possessing them."

Holder's response to Coburn is the latest in a series of mixed messages from Obama and his team after the president vowed during his campaign that he would seek to reinstate the ban.

The White House quickly distanced itself from Holder's comments in February, but the president said during a press conference in Mexico City in April that he has "not backed off at all from my belief that the assault weapons ban makes sense."

Obama acknowledged at the press conference that he was not "under any illusions that reinstating that ban would be easy."

A bi-national panel of former government officials and scholars issued a report on Friday recommending the reinstatement of the assault weapons band. It also called for a crackdown on the illegal export of guns to Mexico.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: banglist; donttreadonme; guns; itsatrick; molonlabe; shallnotbeinfringed
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
Any Attorney General who would give an enemny combatant the same Constitutional Rights as an American citizen is not to EVER be trusted...he will also disarm you anyway he can. In the same vein, any American President who would give an enemy combatant a civil trial with that person's peers as jurors....is not protecting America, he is deliberately protecting a cult called Islam and will disarm you and yours anyway he can as fast as he can.
1 posted on 11/16/2009 11:39:38 AM PST by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yoe

He fears the bitter clingers


2 posted on 11/16/2009 11:42:23 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

If Holder and Obama are not in favor of reinstating the “assault weapon” ban, it means they have something else up their sleeve.


3 posted on 11/16/2009 11:44:16 AM PST by Erik Latranyi (Too many conservatives urge retreat when the war of politics doesn't go their way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

They should.


4 posted on 11/16/2009 11:47:28 AM PST by muddler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yoe

1) He has no idea what an “assault weapon” is.
2) He doesn’t care about the definition, as long as he’s contraverting the 2nd Ammendment.
3) They have no intent to disarm “criminals”, because there focus is on disarming the law abiding citizen.
4) Actual crime prevention is very low on his list of priorities.


5 posted on 11/16/2009 11:51:09 AM PST by G Larry (DNC is comprised of REGRESSIVES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe
If they thinking pushing state run health-care is a PITA for them, gun control would be the kiss of death. I hope they make an issue of it, because it would only help to expedite the derailment of their agenda.


6 posted on 11/16/2009 11:51:14 AM PST by mrmeyer ("When brute force is on the march, compromise is the red carpet." Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

I think the BO administration know they have too many irons in the fire. Once they get past 2010 elections, Health Care, and Cap and Trade, they will risk their remaining political capital on gun control.


7 posted on 11/16/2009 11:54:36 AM PST by TexasRepublic (Socialism is a parasite that kills the host)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

UN??


8 posted on 11/16/2009 11:56:10 AM PST by Sybeck1 (Mmmm, Mmmm, Mmmm.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
BINGO!!!
9 posted on 11/16/2009 11:56:53 AM PST by GOPsterinMA ("Henceforth, you shall be known as...'Nobel Obama'".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yoe
It also called for a crackdown on the illegal export of guns to Mexico.

I'm sure that sealing our southern border will be at the top of the priority list.

/sarc

10 posted on 11/16/2009 11:57:26 AM PST by Disambiguator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

I can’t wait until the 2010 elections when the RATS lose both houses of congress.


11 posted on 11/16/2009 11:57:57 AM PST by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

Yes, that is very true.


12 posted on 11/16/2009 11:59:34 AM PST by Ptarmigan (God Hates Bunnies. God Loves Ptarmigans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: yoe

Don’t you know this socialist administration will be pulling out all of the stops, once they believe they cannot get re-elected because of either term limit after the first four years or public opinion leading up to the last of this term.


13 posted on 11/16/2009 12:05:15 PM PST by jacknhoo (Luke 12:51. Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ozzymandus

I think they are waiting until after the 2010 elections. If they can get past that without losing too many seats, they can unleash hell.


14 posted on 11/16/2009 12:12:32 PM PST by jim_trent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: yoe
Attorney General Eric Holder is retreating on his commitment to pursue a controversial gun-control Disarm the law-abiding measure.

That's what they are really talking about

“The department is currently reviewing existing gun laws to determine how best to combat gun violence and keep guns out of the hands of criminals and others prohibited from possessing them.”

Here's a novel approach – try actually going after the criminals instead of creating news laws that only destroy the Constitutional rights of the law-abiding citizens.

I know, I know... crazy ideas...

15 posted on 11/16/2009 12:27:13 PM PST by chainsaw56 (Do you have the right to defend yourself??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe
This administration has already telegraphed that they intend to wait on gun bans until after they have thrown the chains of cap & trade and government controlled health care on us.

Don't worry, they're just working down the priority list.

Attempting to take our means of overthrowing tyranny is still on the list.

16 posted on 11/16/2009 12:27:56 PM PST by JOAT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

17 posted on 11/16/2009 12:39:26 PM PST by shooter223 (the government should fear the citizens......not the other way around)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jim_trent
I think they are waiting until after the 2010 elections. If they can get past that without losing too many seats, they can unleash hell.

Then we'll just have to counter with heller or hellest.
18 posted on 11/16/2009 12:44:27 PM PST by Dewey Revoltnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: yoe

They are waiting till after Nov 2010.

Keep buying.


19 posted on 11/16/2009 12:57:01 PM PST by NoLibZone (North Korea? The only buildings in Hawaii at risk of destruction are those housing Obama's records!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe
I like that last line, assault weapons band I play in that one some! Heavy metal! Great music!
20 posted on 11/16/2009 12:57:23 PM PST by Quickgun (As a former fetus, I'm opposed to abortion. Pray for Obama,Psalms109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson