[BykrBayb]

Anyone who would slam a piglet against a wall for entertainment would be more likely to abuse a little girl than someone who recognizes how wrong it is to torture for entertainment.

[ConservativeMind]

Anyone who would slam a piglet against a wall for entertainment would be more likely to abuse a little girl than someone who recognizes how wrong it is to torture for entertainment.

You know, I find that argument without merit. How do you know that if someone did something to an animal that they wouldn't need to do it to a person? For instance, if you are hungry for a steak, but eat some other food instead, are you not left full, not desiring the steak?

Pop psychology goes both ways.