Posted on 11/15/2009 4:03:59 PM PST by reaganaut1
Isn’t the split on the Dem side and not the Republican Side?
I have only heard a single Republican in favor, and that is the Progressive Rino Bloomberg.
There were military targets attacked, as well as civilian. This was an act of WAR, not a criminal act. Obie himself said so...when he was Senator Obama in 2006. He himself said they should be tried in a military court. Once again he has genuflected to everyone, and refuses to stand up for (what is supposed to be) his country. I am, once again, sickened.
Bloomberg actually isn’t a Republican anymore, IIRC. He’s an Independent now. He only became a Republican because at the time he ran, NYers still remembered how the Dems had botched NYC so badly before Giuliani and no Dem had any chance of winning.
Personally, I think letting Dems into the GOP without any evidence that they have really had a change of heart and mind is foolish and never works out well for the GOP.
Obama's not going to be happy until there's a muzzein on every block and that hideous Islamic caterwauling echoing down Broadway.
Thanks, I just did.
What can you do to keep them out? Heck, if you wanted to, you could run as a RAT.
GOP and DEms And Obama ...Sucks.
And if the Feds do manage, won't the terrorists then argue that the security required to protect the jurors and their families will prejudice the jurors?
This will be a man-caused disaster of Barry's own making....
But Eric Holder has assured us that they will get the death penalty. Then again, I would not trust Eric Holder with my used cigarette butt after I stumped it out.
Meanwhile the hundreds of millions of dollars in carefully designed trial rooms etc., at Gitmo will sit idly in another year.
Roger that.
Bloomberg isn’t a Republican. He quit a couple of years ago, and now is an Independent.
Yes, if the situation was reversed, we’d be hearing about how the republicans were split on the issue.
How can he assure us they will get the death penalty? Has he rigged the trial?
Please everyone stop calling Bloomberg a Republican.
Bloomberg is the Bloomberg party unto himself.
He is no more a Republican than Scuzzie-wuzzie from New York.
I think they actually have to get some kind of approval, or at least to be a candidate. Bloomberg probably got it because he had huge amounts of his private money available for the campaign.
We had that happen here - the guy “changed” parties and ran as a GOPer because he had no chance of getting elected as a Dem. Of course, once elected, he voted with the Dems and espoused Dem positions. He finally got nabbed in a corruption investigation.
Afterwards, the local GOP boss said he felt really “hurt and betrayed,” because he knew the man socially and trusted him. Moral of the story: never trust a Dem.
I suppose if you want to run for a county office, you go to the court house.
Anyone can run.
The guy probably voted for him. You are absolutely correct—NEVER trust a RAT.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.