And if we're lucky in 1012 Dems will be at risk of losing Obama's old Oval Office
To: AtlasStalled
Kirk is a douche bag, but I am going with anything is better.
2 posted on
11/15/2009 10:00:00 AM PST by
lookout88
(.combat rescue officer's dad,)
To: AtlasStalled
It was never Obama’s seat to begin with he got it by playing dirty .
4 posted on
11/15/2009 10:05:32 AM PST by
Venturer
To: AtlasStalled
It's going to be a BLOOD BATH for DEMONCRATS.
Just watch .... . The sheeple are tired of being ignored and even the dumbest Dem is beginning to catch on to the disasters going on.
6 posted on
11/15/2009 10:07:36 AM PST by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
To: AtlasStalled
Man, I’d love to see it but I doubt it.
To: AtlasStalled
LOL at the end of the article. Controversy?
Kirk, billed as a moderate, was caught up in a controversy last week when news leaked out that he solicited Sarah Palin for support.
10 posted on
11/15/2009 10:31:23 AM PST by
byteback
To: AtlasStalled
This is spin fron the Sun-Times.
Kirk is even more liberal than Burris.
To: AtlasStalled
And if we're lucky in 1012...Ah, yes - the good old days.
17 posted on
11/15/2009 1:18:36 PM PST by
Libloather
(Tea totaler, PROUD birther, mobster, pro-lifer, anti-warmer, enemy of the state, extremist....)
To: AtlasStalled
21 posted on
11/15/2009 3:20:40 PM PST by
jmaroneps37
(Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
To: AtlasStalled
Combiner Kirk is no ally of Republicans, and certainly not Conservatives.
23 posted on
11/15/2009 6:40:51 PM PST by
fieldmarshaldj
(~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson