To: 4rcane
I quite agree. As the article sets forth
" For those to come into play, a determination must be made that the employee was acting manifestly outside the scope of his official employment or official responsibilities, with malicious purpose, in bad faith or in a wanton or reckless manner.
Surely these 'civil servants' acted maliciously and ouside the scope of their official duties.
4 posted on
11/14/2009 11:40:28 PM PST by
Stand Watch Listen
("All that's necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.")
To: Stand Watch Listen
They were employees of a democrat administration. I have no problem believing their official duties include criminal activities against Republicans or anyone else who opposes them or their leaders.
8 posted on
11/15/2009 12:00:12 AM PST by
tdscpa
To: Stand Watch Listen
That looks like a slam dunk based on the plain language of the law.
15 posted on
11/15/2009 12:43:13 AM PST by
FredZarguna
("A nation is not beaten until the hearts of its right-wing women are on the ground.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson