Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anti Palin comments are counter-productive and should not be tolerated among us. (Vanity)
myself

Posted on 11/14/2009 10:57:36 AM PST by se_ohio_young_conservative

Those of you. You know who you are.

I don't care who you are or what your reasoning is. Your siding with the maistream media against Palin is doing nothing to help Republicans or Conservatism in general. You are hurting your own cause. Unless you are a DU troll. Or a liberal Republican who has no idea what the heck you are even talking about.

Ani Palin comments (such as "shes not fit to be President") should be seen as trolling and should not be tolerated on Free Republic, any conservative web site or any conservative setting. While I am not calling for anyone to be purged from this website. I, and others are going to keep a list of Palin hating trolls so the rest of you know who has credibility and who doesn't. who is a troll, and who isn't.

We will know your posting history. We know where your opinons are coming from. The Palin bashing is getting old. And the cat calls will likely increase for Jim Robinson to do some fall cleaning if this continues.

So, please. stop inflicting damage on conservatism.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: dontbeameanie; eyeroll; hatecrime; itsallaboutme; leavesarahalone; moby; mommybillysaid; mommywaaaaaah; palin; policeman; poorliddlesarah; poorwiddlesarah; ridiculous; sarahissooostrong; sticksandstones; stupidpost; troll; waaaaah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 221 next last
To: bredred120

This is a unique situation. Because the media pretty much launched a war against this woman. And Palin haters on this very website seem to be on their side.


121 posted on 11/14/2009 11:43:57 AM PST by se_ohio_young_conservative (Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: se_ohio_young_conservative
Ani Palin comments (such as "shes not fit to be President") should be seen as trolling and should not be tolerated on Free Republic, any conservative web site or any conservative setting.

Here you go, bub. I don't think she is fit to be president. How is that a personal attack? What has she done to be rewarded such an esteemed office? Just because she has the right conservative views? I have those views, thousands of people on this site have those views. Are we ALL fit to be the freaking leader of the free world? And don't bring up the Boy-king Obama or Romney or any other lame politicians. Just let us know when the anti-palin purge comes around, so I will shut up. I love FreeRepublic more than I dislike this Palin worship.

122 posted on 11/14/2009 11:44:48 AM PST by abishai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!
You are correct, but to say the Palin critics here are considerate and fair, I'd say they THINK they are considerate and fair. Do any of these critics know her personally? If not, where did they get thier information? The MSM? That can't be good. I know Sarah has faults, everyone does, But I still support her. And debate is good,we will just have to ask those who post here how they arrived at thier negative opinion. Maybe we can change thier mind.☺
123 posted on 11/14/2009 11:46:10 AM PST by Quickgun (As a former fetus, I'm opposed to abortion. Pray for Obama,Psalms109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: se_ohio_young_conservative
Those of you. You know who you are.

I don't care who you are...you are hurting your own cause...

Anti-anti Palin comments...should be seen as trolling and should not be tolerated on Free Republic.

There, fixed it for ya. Now I'm going back having a life.

124 posted on 11/14/2009 11:46:25 AM PST by saint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abishai
GO MITT!!!!!!! lmao
125 posted on 11/14/2009 11:46:49 AM PST by Snurple (VEGETARIAN, OLD INDIAN WORD FOR BAD HUNTER.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: se_ohio_young_conservative

YOU WANNA PIECE OF ME????

....just kidding, just kidding.

126 posted on 11/14/2009 11:47:18 AM PST by DCPatriot ("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: se_ohio_young_conservative

“This is a unique situation.”

Precisely what Obama and the democrats said when they spent your money to bail out the UAW, and when they wasted your money on a bogus stimuulus, and when they spent your money to bail out the the banks that were “too big to fail”, and when they said they needed to spend $1 trillion of your dollars to institute socialized healthcare, and when they said...


127 posted on 11/14/2009 11:48:20 AM PST by PAR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: se_ohio_young_conservative

Have you never heard the old adage that the BEST REVENGE IS SUCCESS?
Sarah is meting out revenge every damn day and twice on some days. Have some faith.


128 posted on 11/14/2009 11:48:31 AM PST by MestaMachine (One if by land, 2 if by sea, 3 if by Air Force 1. Afghanistan Updates Daily on My Profile)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin
You are dumber than Palin

Another stellar post from a Palin hater.

Who would have thunk it?

129 posted on 11/14/2009 11:49:11 AM PST by sausageseller (http://coolblue.typepad.com/the_cool_blue_blog/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Mean Maryjean
What in the hell is that supposed to mean: "I DO wish she would return to the Church, because I don't see how she can battle the evil administration that is now in place without the Sacraments."
---
Someone told me Sarah was baptized in the Catholic Church. Possibly they did not have the correct information, but, yes, I do not think she can beat this administration without returning to the Church and, thus, receiving the Sacraments. The Sacraments hold the True Body of Christ [quite literally] and she or anyone else that does battle with Barack [remember, his ways are not only dark, but demonic] will need them to win the race. The only other way is if many, many Christians [of all denominations -- not faiths that condone abortion or homosexual marriage, or other sins, however] are constantly praying for her success -- you can't beat evil via a casual slap and charge.

Pray the Rosary for our nation (and take a virtual visit to the Vatican and Lourdes as well).
130 posted on 11/14/2009 11:49:35 AM PST by mlizzy ("Do not wait for leaders; do it alone, person to person" --Mother Teresa.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: se_ohio_young_conservative
I think the best advice is we need to weigh the facts and do not hesitate to point out where there is a problem. If you want to advocate for Sarah Palin, support those who make true statements and bring forth the truth as best as you know it to those who make false statements.
131 posted on 11/14/2009 11:49:56 AM PST by jonrick46 (The Obama Administration is a blueprint for Fabian Socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: se_ohio_young_conservative
Dude/Dudette,

First of all, I love Sarah, and I think she would make a great President. Just watching the left panic and wet their collective pants would make it worth it. That's my opinion and I am very conservative.

Now, having said that...Free Republic is exactly that...free. We embody all walks of life, all genders and races, and widely varied opinions. There are going to be people who don't like Sarah for one reason or another, ranging from the fact that she's a woman, to the fact that she has children.

Butt we all know what opinions are like, and we all have one. You seem very passionate about your stance on the subject, thus you also have an opinion.

However, you're coming across like Party-line Pete, and almost demanding that we jump into lockstep with your opinion...well dude...ain't gonna happen here on FR...I've been around here since 2001, and believe me, this is not a lockstep group. The FR gang actually is the epitome of conservatism as we're mostly all individualists with our own opinons...and I get flammed plenty for some of the things I post.

Remember, you can't PUSH a ROPE! The people who are easily lulled in to a zombie trance and follow ACORN to the polling booth, are democrats. The people to try to threaten and intimidate you into following THEIR ideas, are democrats.

Take a breath...the cream always rises to the top, and if it is meant for Sarah to shake up the world, then it will happen. I know out of the current list of qualified conservatives, she has my vote.

But she has my vote because I have watched and listened to what she says, and I have studied her record. I'm 64 years old and all that catterwalling about her dresses, her children, and her ethics charges (all overturned) is just tabliod chatter to keep some flea-bitten journalists in jobs.

The sour grapes McCan't campaign geeks are trying to off-load their failures onto her, and I certainly would never base my opinion of anyone on a Katie here's-my-colin Couric interview...the lowest rated anchor in the business. To do that would tend to elevate the importance of Couric to some superior level, and she's just a teleprompter reader who convinced someone to put her on prime time.

It's a long way to 2012, and a lot of things can happen. Hey, who saw her resignation coming? I sure didn't. But in hindsight, I think it was a great move, and showed leadership and compassion for the state of Alaska that she loves, and for her family.

Those that ridiculed her decision to resign are the same ones who piled all the phoney ethics charges on her, causing her to have astronomical legal bills. So it was a smart move. She could have quit after a week, and still had more administrative and leadership experience than our current pres-ent.

I like that line in the movie that went, "You never know what the tide will bring in tomorrow."...or something like that.

So chill on the groupthink, we're all going to think what we think, and we cannot be "herded" into a party line or a lockstep...if you want that behavior, go over to DU.

So chill...whatever will be, will be.
132 posted on 11/14/2009 11:50:16 AM PST by FrankR (To Congress: You cram it down our throats in '09, We'll shove it up your ass in '10!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BornToBeAmerican
"I believe this country needs Sarah and 1,000’s if not millions just like her."

We are out here.

Just so we are clear I worship no one. But how many stayed home and passed on the presidential vote because the republican party anointed McCain? Look what we have now. Comply with what we say or go to jail.

133 posted on 11/14/2009 11:51:28 AM PST by blackbart.223 (I live in Northern Nevada. Reid doesn't represent me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: se_ohio_young_conservative

I am very proud of those that stand of the side of free speech, even if I disagree with you on a subject, I still respect your willingness to debate an issue. That’s one of the things that makes us American’s.


134 posted on 11/14/2009 11:53:12 AM PST by A Strict Constructionist (How long before we are forced to refresh the Tree of Liberty? Sic semper tryannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: se_ohio_young_conservative

“The RINO Palin haters are the nearest wrong to right.”

Equating opposition and decent to hate is so DU, it is not becoming to anyone here.

I personally hope that (if she does run) Romney, Huckabee or whoever throw everything they have at her (if they cross the line they will pay for it), then, if she perseveres, she will be ready to be president.

Stay out of the fray if you want it easy.


135 posted on 11/14/2009 11:54:18 AM PST by Peter Horry (Those who aren't responsible always know best.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: A Strict Constructionist

I forgot to include, your not included.


136 posted on 11/14/2009 11:55:49 AM PST by A Strict Constructionist (How long before we are forced to refresh the Tree of Liberty? Sic semper tryannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: REDWOOD99

dito!


137 posted on 11/14/2009 11:58:18 AM PST by ShackledNoMore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bredred120
"Nothing should be sugar coated here, we need to make sure she is THE most qualified person to represent right-of-center, and THE most likely person to topple obummer in 2012."

That sure worked last time. Obama is in charge. We will live to regret that one.

138 posted on 11/14/2009 11:58:43 AM PST by blackbart.223 (I live in Northern Nevada. Reid doesn't represent me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: blackbart.223
I never did understand that, why is Zero fit to be president and Sarah is not? Every time he opens his mouth lies flow out. Every time she opens her mouth I hear common sense and patriotism.
139 posted on 11/14/2009 12:00:11 PM PST by Americanexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: se_ohio_young_conservative

So who died and left you in charge of discourse on FR?


140 posted on 11/14/2009 12:00:42 PM PST by algernonpj (He who pays the piper . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 221 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson