Every religionist - like you - is - has to be - at root a fanatic. You can't prove your beliefs so you resort to nonsense. I gave you an objective definiton of happiness, your response was "lots of words there". Do you understand that such a response is linguistically, logically and empirically absurd? Is that within your intellectual grasp, or am I wasting my breath here?
Every religionist - like you - is - has to be - at root a fanatic.
Oh, my.... so now you've gone full-blown libertarian ad hominem, and right on schedule, too.
You guys are soooo predictable.