Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Research: Women in China See 17% Higher Breast Cancer Risk From Abortion
LifeNews.com ^ | November 12, 2009 | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 11/12/2009 9:48:28 AM PST by julieee

Research: Women in China See 17% Higher Breast Cancer Risk From Abortion

Beijing, China -- Chinese researchers have issued a new study indicating women who have had abortions face a 17 percent higher chance of contracting breast cancer than women who carried their pregnancy to term. One leading American scientist says he believes the increased risk is even higher.

http://www.LifeNews.com/int1379.html

(Excerpt) Read more at LifeNews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abortion; breastcancer; china; women

1 posted on 11/12/2009 9:48:28 AM PST by julieee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: julieee

I am not a doctor but doesnt a full term pregnancy and birth pose it’s own risks? Are they low?


2 posted on 11/12/2009 9:57:57 AM PST by sickoflibs ( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the government spending you demand stupid")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

You don’t interrupt the bodies preperation for the preganacy process without consequences.
Women that know ANYTHING about the female system KNOWS THIS simple FACT.


3 posted on 11/12/2009 10:08:48 AM PST by Marty62 (former Marty60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Marty62

I dont doubt that. It’s just statistics can be misleading.

The pro-choice-abortees will claim abortion is for women’s health, they may mean ‘mental health’ or something else in the abstract.

Didnt the pill have similar problems?


4 posted on 11/12/2009 10:14:53 AM PST by sickoflibs ( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the government spending you demand stupid")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

Yes the early “pills” were having extreme effects on the Breasts.
Mimic pregnancy.
I assume the newer ones are different.


5 posted on 11/12/2009 10:28:55 AM PST by Marty62 (former Marty60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: julieee

yes. exhaustion. :-).


6 posted on 11/12/2009 10:30:44 AM PST by GOP Poet (Obama is an OLYMPIC failure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
oops. i wrongly posted the following to the initial poster, but meant this for you:

yes. exhaustion. :-).

7 posted on 11/12/2009 10:32:12 AM PST by GOP Poet (Obama is an OLYMPIC failure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
I am not a doctor but doesnt a full term pregnancy and birth pose it’s own risks? Are they low?

Your hormones get to decrease at a normal rate.
Actually having more babies tends to reduce Breast cancer risk.
I first heard this connection on a CNN news report 20 tears ago. But they never aired it again...suddenly it was not news worthy of reporting.

An agenda perhaps?

8 posted on 11/12/2009 11:49:43 AM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson