Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Behemoth the Cat

So your saying that if the Temple of Darwin were to ever find a naturalistic origin of life that it wouldn’t be considered part of evolution? PLEASE!


38 posted on 11/12/2009 9:55:24 AM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: GodGunsGuts
"So your saying that if the Temple of Darwin were to ever find a naturalistic origin of life that it wouldn’t be considered part of evolution? PLEASE!"

Precisely. Evolution is one thing, origins quite another. Evolution involves natural selection. Any hypothetical naturalistic explanation of the origins of life would be likely based on an entirely different concept of probability.

48 posted on 11/12/2009 10:09:01 AM PST by Behemoth the Cat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts; Behemoth the Cat
What the evolosers are saying on this one boils down to something like

" Hey, you know if we get good enough with the ad-hominems, we might could get by with just trying to defend one indefensible brain-dead ideological doctrine instead of two of em!! "

109 posted on 11/12/2009 7:20:41 PM PST by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson