Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GodGunsGuts
"So your saying that if the Temple of Darwin were to ever find a naturalistic origin of life that it wouldn’t be considered part of evolution? PLEASE!"

Precisely. Evolution is one thing, origins quite another. Evolution involves natural selection. Any hypothetical naturalistic explanation of the origins of life would be likely based on an entirely different concept of probability.

48 posted on 11/12/2009 10:09:01 AM PST by Behemoth the Cat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: Behemoth the Cat
I beg to differ. Evos tend to be evos de haut en bas:

http://www.tufts.edu/as/wright_center/cosmic_evolution/docs/splash.html

51 posted on 11/12/2009 10:22:10 AM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: Behemoth the Cat; GodGunsGuts; tpanther

The folks are Berkeley disagree....

http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/origsoflife_01


63 posted on 11/12/2009 11:05:53 AM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson