[Jaime2099]

Don't hold your breath GGG, Darwinists are anti-creation not pro-science. Evidence means nothing to them in the slightest, especially if it shows that creationists line of thinking appears to be more accurate. They would much rather play dating guessing games then face the reality of scientific evidence that God may have actually created the universe.

If all these soft tissue findings hold up, then there is no more evidence needed to show that the current dating techniques are a complete joke and all of Evolution must be brought into question and removed from its pedestal in science.

[GodGunsGuts]

EXCELLENT POINT, JAIME!

[freedumb2003]

>>Darwinists are anti-creation not pro-science. Evidence means nothing to them in the slightest, especially if it shows that creationists line of thinking appears to be more accurate.<<

There is no such thing as a “Darwinist.” There are those who understand science and attribute the early genesis of what is now The Theory of Evolution to Darwin. Just as there are no “Copernicists” nor “Einsteinists” nor “Curieists.”

As far as creationism having “evidence” — when you introduce me to the corporeal ID and it (or He) tells us how to use what it does every single time in a definable and predictable way, you have just theology.

Your understanding of science is based in the depths of your apologetics and Luddite folklore, not on the actual practice.