Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

So a religious landlord who wants to honor the Lord by not having a heterosexual cohabiting couple or a homosexual "couple" rent their properties is now on the opposite side of the official LDS church?

All because they can't stand the heat by the homosexual crowd? They are sending the wrong message to them & their bully tactics -- and that's on top of coming down wrongly in trying to treat "sexual orientation" as protected class status.

How does the Mormon church define "sexual orientation" anyway?

1 posted on 11/11/2009 6:01:17 AM PST by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Colofornian

Please do not alter headlines.


2 posted on 11/11/2009 6:02:32 AM PST by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Colofornian

Wow.

This is even more huge than the Episcopalians doing it. How could someone who has actually read the Bible AND THE CONSTITUTION support this? It goes against both. The constitution does not treat people differently. The law applies equally to all. It is not necessary to call out straights, gays, black, blue, baseball fans, or any other group.

And of course that is the minor point. The Bible is the main one.


6 posted on 11/11/2009 6:11:21 AM PST by RobRoy (The US today: Revelation 18:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Colofornian
I'm okay with this. Gays are no worse than anyone who sins. They shouldn't be denied access to housing or employment. But too, their sinful relationships shouldn't be recognized as legal marriages.

If a landlord chooses not to rent to them or to people of certain ethnicities, or religions, then perhaps he shouldn't be a landlord any more.

JMHO

7 posted on 11/11/2009 6:13:03 AM PST by colorcountry (A faith without truth is not true faith.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Colofornian

>>...and that’s on top of coming down wrongly in trying to treat “sexual orientation” as protected class status. <<

You nailed it. Our country is founded on a constitution that protects the individual, not “classes”.

In the US, the individual - not classes or groups - is king.


9 posted on 11/11/2009 6:15:41 AM PST by RobRoy (The US today: Revelation 18:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Colofornian

Salt Lake City has been moving left for a long time, just like the SC who insist on “Lovable Lindsey” in the Senate.


14 posted on 11/11/2009 6:21:21 AM PST by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Colofornian

Used to be you could count on Mormons being conservative. That has been wearing down for years. Lots of mushy liberal Mormons out there. Plus they are illegal immigrant friendly in Utah

Still are conservative Mormons but their ranks are thinning


19 posted on 11/11/2009 6:31:52 AM PST by dennisw (Obama -- our very own loopy, leftist god-thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Colofornian
Ya think this had church approval before the city council voted on it?
21 posted on 11/11/2009 6:41:10 AM PST by Graybeard58 ( Selah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Colofornian
Nothing new from the dollar is God crowd, same bunch wants illegals so they can convert them and then collect offerings.
22 posted on 11/11/2009 6:42:21 AM PST by org.whodat (Vote: Chuck De Vore in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Colofornian

So if you own a business or property then I guess you have no right to decide who is associated with your business or property based upon their open expression of homosexual sexual views and associated behavior? This type of legislation is anti-freedom and will be used to create lawsuits whereas any business owners will feel as if they will have to give preferential treatment to those who openly profess their homosexual behavior in the workplace or be brought to court. It is sad that so many in our country do not see the issues as they really are.

There is no reason to protect expressions in public of homosexual behavior.


26 posted on 11/11/2009 7:03:40 AM PST by TheBigIf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Colofornian

The Mormon Church issued this message about 10 years ago and to my knowledge is still in effect:

“People inquire about our position on those who consider themselves so-called gays and lesbians...and who have certain inclinations which are powerful and which may be difficult to control. Most people have inclinations of one kind or another at various times. If they do not act upon these inclinations, then they can go forward as do all other members of the Church. If they violate the law of chastity and the moral standards of the Church, then they are subject to the discipline of the Church, just as others are”...”We want to help these people, to strengthen them, to assist them with their problems and to help them with their difficulties. But we cannot stand idle if they indulge in immoral activity, if they try to uphold and defend and live in a so-called same-sex marriage situation. To permit such would be to make light of the very serious and sacred foundation of God-sanctioned marriage and its very purpose, the rearing of families”
My understanding is:
Members of the church are encouraged to treat each other with love and respect, Being a homosexual is not a sin, engaging in homosexual activity is a sin because you are breaking the law of chastity, This law applies to ALL Single members of the church and not just homosexuals.Single members must remain celebate outside of marriage.
Homosexual activity is sin that probably would keep a member from having a calling and taking sacrament on Sunday but unless the member is unrepentent would not lead to excommunication.


30 posted on 11/11/2009 7:25:12 AM PST by ODDITHER (HAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Colofornian
Salt Lake City has become the first Utah city to offer housing and employment protections for gays and lesbians — an action supported by the Mormon Church.

How?

Can any of the Mormon's on FR offer an explanation that justifies this?

31 posted on 11/11/2009 7:32:08 AM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Colofornian

At its root and foundation the mormon church is not conservative.

Proof? See my tagline for the proof.

P.S. I know you agree, I’m just writing it “for the record”.


40 posted on 11/11/2009 8:42:16 AM PST by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Colofornian

The Morons are now pro-sodomite and pro-open borders. Where is Joseph Smith when you need him to kill some heretics?


65 posted on 01/10/2012 9:02:27 PM PST by rmlew ("Mosques are our barracks, minarets our bayonets, domes our helmets, the believers our soldiers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson