Posted on 11/09/2009 6:32:02 PM PST by naturalman1975
A SELF-STYLED Muslim Sheik has chained himself to the steps of a Sydney courthouse in a bid to convey his message of peace.
Sheik Haron appeared at the Downing Centre Local Court today charged with sending harassing letters to the families of dead Australian soldiers.
As the Daily Telegraph revealed last month, Sheik Haron - whose real name is Man Monis - allegedly sent the letters over two years, devastating the families of seven Diggers who died in Afghanistan.
One letter was addressed to a widow, care of a funeral home and he apparently accused some of the dead Australian soldiers of being "criminals", "killers" and "murderers" fighting a war of invasion.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailytelegraph.com.au ...
This is apparently a Muslim message of peace.
I think they should cut the chain with explosives.
There is of course the inconvenient fact that the US and its Ozzian allies did indeed invade Afghanistan and Iraq.
Because, of course, we wanted to steal all the Afghans' stuff.
I suggest building a fence around him and leaving him there without sustenance till he voluntarily decides to come away.
>> I think they should cut the chain with explosives.
That would be good.
If they’re squeamish about that, just cut off whatever body part he has the chain attached to. I hear those pedophile worshippers are fond of that sort of thing, so he’ll feel right at home.
A SELF-STYLED Muslim Sheik has chained himself to the steps of a Sydney courthouse in a bid to convey his message of peace.
_______________________________________________
Silly sheihk...
Thats not how its done...
if you want everyuone to know you belong to a peaceful religion...
You go to your nearest US installation ...
and murder and wound about 50 people...
Then everyone will love you and know you come in peace...
Does anyone here care if I leave off the ......
>> we wanted to steal all the Afghans’ stuff
Can’t they, like, raise their *own* goats in Australia?
And beyond that, what is there to steal?
Leave him there until the buzzards clean him up.
That's where the enemy was.
On Afghanistan in particular, if coming to the defence of one of our closest allies when innocent civilians on its own soul are murdered, means invasion - I'm all for invasion.
On Iraq - it was simply finishing the job people like myself were forced to leave unfinished in 1991. The invasion of Iraq was a belated reponse to the invasion of Kuwait.
I don’t disagree that both invasions were fully justified.
The article seems to imply that calling them invasions is mean. Whereas it’s just a statement of fact.
Was his name Sheik Fred Mohammad Sahib Phelps?
Even the British, who colonized some of the most forsaken land on the planet, couldn’t bring themselves to actually stay in Afghanistan.
Of course, this was largely due to the remarkably unfriendly natives.
I’ve read British soldiers’ diaries from various Afghan wars in the 19th and early 20th centuries. With the exception of today’s PCness and IEDs they aren’t much different from what today’s western troops face.
Turn away, everyone...

Yes...the religion of peace.
So contradictory.
Here’s a different idea. Support his demonstration! Chain him with another chain and lock to the courthouse steps and then leave. He has the key to one chain and lock but not the other. After a couple of days, offer him pork sausage and salt water.
I was thinking just put up a partition around him,
and fill it with concrete...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.