There's no honor among thieves. Dems got this atrocity passed only by including the Stupak amendment. I'm sure the plan all along by Pelosi and her mafia was to get this thing passed then renege on the promises it took to get it passed. Wasserman is a Pelosi protege. If she's making this threat it's coming straight from Pelosi's hideous maw. So to the Lap Dog, whoops, sorry, Blue Dog Democrats who voted for PelosiCare, take note your party's disgusting leadership is already plotting to screw you over. These people are utter evil.
To: MissesBush
If they do that I hope Cao and the Democrats who voted Yay on the strength of that exclusion should punish them severely on any future votes ... on anything.
2 posted on
11/09/2009 10:04:14 AM PST by
Lorianne
To: MissesBush
Of course it will be. That’s what Pelousy had planned all along.
3 posted on
11/09/2009 10:04:39 AM PST by
Dick Bachert
('08 WASN'T AN ELECTION. IT WAS AN INFESTATION. FUMIGATION HAS ALREADY BEGUN!)
To: MissesBush
..to Boener's credit he repeatedly asked the big Democrat players to guarantee that the Stupak language would be protected in conference--no way
This tells me that Stupak, Ellison and the rest are merely looking for a pro-life fig leaf to hide behind come election time--they KNOW that their leadership will kill it in time...
4 posted on
11/09/2009 10:05:07 AM PST by
WalterSkinner
( In Memory of My Father--WWII Vet and Patriot 1926-2007)
To: MissesBush
This whole thing is so revolting
5 posted on
11/09/2009 10:07:06 AM PST by
RaiderRose
(Obama has cured my husband's political apathy.)
To: MissesBush
Come Judgment Day... the line of dims (the one with the elevator to hell) will circle the Earth 5000 times.
LLS
6 posted on
11/09/2009 10:10:10 AM PST by
LibLieSlayer
(hussama will never be my president... NEVER!)
To: MissesBush
It was extremely painful for me to feel compelled to vote for a bill that contained that kind of restriction on a woman's ability to make her own reproductive choices, Wasserman Schultz said. What a crock! The amendment doesnt restrict anyone from making her own choices. It just requires that she pay for that choice herself.
7 posted on
11/09/2009 10:11:00 AM PST by
freespirited
(Liberals are only liberal about sex & drugs. Otherwise, they want to control your life. --DHorowitz)
To: MissesBush
8 posted on
11/09/2009 10:13:19 AM PST by
pillut48
(CJ in TX --"God help us all, and God help America!!" --my new mantra for the next 4 years)
To: MissesBush
NAnZI Pelosi and her sisters in the dem party will stop at nothing, just like hitler.
10 posted on
11/09/2009 10:16:23 AM PST by
tioga
To: MissesBush
So the question is, if the Stupak amendment is stripped out of a final bill, will Stupak and his group vote for the final bill? Popular logic would conclude that they would have to vote against the final bill, which would defeat it. But at this time we seem to be in a surreal world of deception, manipulation, blackmail, threats, and outright lies dominating the political system in Washington. So who knows what will happen. We need 50% turnover in the House in 2010 to flush out the vermin and renew the constitutional system that our Founding Fathers gave us.
11 posted on
11/09/2009 10:19:21 AM PST by
your local physicist
(If the Canadians and Brazilians can drill for oil off their Atlantic coast, why can't we?)
To: MissesBush
It doesn’t matter if the medical bill includes “language” about abortion or if it doesn’t.
The bill itself is blatantly unconstitutional, and in combination with the carbon legislation represents a complete power grab, a coup d’etat.
The abortion elements can be added in anytime after its passed. Once you’ve lost the constitution there is no barrier to anything anyone has the power to do.
We are witnessing a coup being perpetrated by the government against the constitutional order, and we watch it like we’re watching a football game.
12 posted on
11/09/2009 10:19:42 AM PST by
marron
To: MissesBush
From a WaPo article:
Although House liberals voted for the bill with the amendment to keep the process moving forward, Rep. Diana DeGette (Colo.) said she has collected more than 40 signatures from House Democrats vowing to oppose any final bill that includes the amendment -- enough to block passage.
"There's going to be a firestorm here," DeGette said. "Women are going to realize that a Democratic-controlled House has passed legislation that would prohibit women paying for abortions with their own funds. . . . We're not going to let this into law."
13 posted on
11/09/2009 10:20:09 AM PST by
randita
(Chains you can bereave in.)
To: MissesBush
Stupak=STUPIDPak
What idiot’s believed that this amendment was anything but cover for Dems in conservative districts.
Mark my words. The abortion issue will be the death of this country.
19 posted on
11/09/2009 11:11:40 AM PST by
A Strict Constructionist
(How long before we are forced to refresh the Tree of Liberty?)
To: MissesBush
Nancy Pelosi has just rammed the most anti-human bill yet through that House of Whores. She is a tyrant just like every other tyrant the human race has produced.
20 posted on
11/09/2009 11:18:06 AM PST by
MichiganConservative
(Abolish the IRS, income tax, the 16th amendment and the Federal Reserve. Replace them with nothing.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson