As usual your science is a wrong as your theological interpretations. No controversy has been resolved because one does not exist. You have not proved your young age assertion for the specimens you posted as satisfying neither of the conditions I stated. Without elemental analysis you haven't established that it is even organic or if it is organic the conditions of its anaerobic preservation.
Yeah, but I think it was written this morning, despite all kinds of evidence to the contrary. So, it's actually subsequent to your article. Call me a "Young Aritcle Creationist"