As usual your science is a wrong as your theological interpretations. No controversy has been resolved because one does not exist. You have not proved your young age assertion for the specimens you posted as satisfying neither of the conditions I stated. Without elemental analysis you haven't established that it is even organic or if it is organic the conditions of its anaerobic preservation.
There was indeed a controversy over whether the dino soft tissue was indeed soft tissue. That controversy has now been resolved in favor of dino soft tissue preservation, and, as mentioned above, such soft tissue finds are being discovered on a fairly regular basis now.