[GourmetDan]

"Thanks again. I just want people who read these to know that most of us know what science is, how it operates and how TToE works and are not willfully ignorant."

You're welcome again. If you are implying that invoking the fallacy of affirming the consequent in support of evolution is 'science', be my guest. I want the people who read these threads to know that you think supporting theories with logical fallacy is 'how science and TToE works'.

You can keep your eyes as shut as you wish.

[freedumb2003]

>>If you are implying that invoking the fallacy of affirming the consequent in support of evolution is ‘science’, be my guest. I want the people who read these threads to know that you think supporting theories with logical fallacy is ‘how science and TToE works’.<<

Hmm — you put me in a dilemma. Is using a fallacious fallacy, as you have done, a meta fallacy? Or is it like using the Easy Button to find the Easy Button?

I will ponder on that — good night and nice try on using some grown-up words that someone probably just used on you. I could pinch your little cheeks.