Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Palin rallies thousands of abortion opponents
Politco ^ | 11-7-09

Posted on 11/07/2009 5:16:47 PM PST by STARWISE

WEST ALLIS, Wisc. – Sarah Palin rallied thousands of abortion opponents Friday night with a a stark warning that the same philosophy that allows abortion rights could soon be invoked to allow the government to cut off health care for the elderly or children with special needs.

Speaking to a fund-raising banquet of Wisconsin Right to Life, the former Alaska governor and 2008 Republican vice presidential nominee asserted that if policy-makers don’t believe a child in the womb is valuable, then “perhaps the same mind-set applies to other persons.”

“What may they feel about an elderly person who doesn’t have a whole lot of productive years left,” Palin asked an audience of about 5,000 who paid $30 each to hear her speak in an airplane hangar-like exhibition hall at the Wisconsin state fairgrounds just outside of Milwaukee. “In order to save government money, government health care has to be rationed… [so] than this elderly person that perhaps could be seen as costing taxpayers to pay for a non-productive life? Do you think our elderly will be first in line for limited health care?

“And what about the child who perhaps isn’t deemed normal or perfect per someone’s subjective measure of their use or questionable purpose in the eyes of a panel of bureaucrats making our healthcare decisions for us,” she continued.

Palin did not expressly raise the prospect of government-mandated “death panels” to determine who lives or dies – the incendiary and inaccurate charge she made over the summer about Democratic health care plans—but repeatedly suggested that liberal social policies could lead to de facto euthanasia.

Her warning was couched in repeated rhetorical questions about what might happen when laws are made by those she portrayed as having an insufficient appreciation for the sanctity of all human life.

“We have to think this through,” she said. “We have to get to the truth of this matter, healthcare reform.”

The fund-raiser was advertised as closed to media coverage, but at least three reporters, including one from POLITICO, attended simply by purchasing a ticket like other members of the public.

Palin has made few public appearances since resigning as governor in July, sequestering herself to write a much-anticipated book coming out later this month. But a year after the election that made her a global celebrity, her star has dimmed little with those same conservative activists who thronged her campaign rallies in this and other states.

The event made clear that for her ardent supporters she remains more phenomenon than traditional politician.

The line to get into the venue here stretched over a half-mile outside the building and a local conservative talk radio station even marked the event by printing t-shirts that welcomed her to the city, noted the date of her appearance and deemed her: “America’s Conservative Conscience.” The anti-abortion group that hosted the event sought to raise money by including pledge cards on every chair that included an offer to become part of “Sarah’s Rogues” by giving $1,000 to the group in exchange for an autographed copy of her forthcoming memoir, “Going Rogue: An American Life.

The event and the enthusiastic response were a vivid reminder of the following she commands. But her remarks also illuminated the mix of assets and limitations she would possess if she seeks to become a 2012 presidential contender.

Palin had remarks prepared but frequently wandered off-script to make a point, offering audience members a casual “awesome” or “bogus” in discussing otherwise weighty topics.

As in: “It is so bogus that society is sending a message right now and has been for probably the last 40 years that a woman isn’t strong enough or smart enough to be able to pursue an education, a career and her rights and still let her baby live.”

Other Palin touchstones included: praise for the military, jeers for the “the liberal media” and a general manner of speaking that often veered into rhetorical culs-de-sac.

While she drew applause during her remarks, Palin’s extemporaneous and frequently discursive style was such that she never truly roused a true-believing crowd as passionate about the issue at hand as she. Not once during her address did they rise to their feet.

In a closing exhortation, she urged the audience, “Don't ever let anyone to tell you to sit down and shut up.”

Rest @ link


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abortion; proliferally; sarahpalin; wisconsin
LOL ... those lib reporters just HAVE to spin it and inject negativism.

***

"While she drew applause during her remarks, Palin’s extemporaneous and frequently discursive style was such that she never truly roused a true-believing crowd as passionate about the issue at hand as she. Not once during her address did they rise to their feet.

She then got a standing ovation from most of the crowd, but a few had begun to leave before she even finished and within seconds of her concluding, scores more got up and put on their jackets as they walked away."~~~~

~~~

Palin Speech: No Phones, Laptops, Photos…

Former Alaska governor and 2008 GOP presidential candidate Sarah Palin will be speaking at an event hosted by the group Wisconsin Right to Life this evening.

It is a closed event – which generally means no press.

Amid apparent worries that the ex-governor's words will be aired publicly despite that restriction, however, Wisconsin Right to Life and/or Palin's handlers are taking the notion of "closed" to a whole new level.

Check out this list of prohibited items at the event, which was spotted by CBS News Political Director Steve Chaggaris. All bags, by the way, "will be searched":

•No cell phones
•No recording devices
•No video or still cameras
•No laptops
•No photos or recording allowed
•No literature distribution
•No posters or banners
•No strollers or car seats
•No carry-in food or beverages

~~~~~

They know the vitriol, viciousness and havoc the hateful left can wreak. Go, Sarah!

1 posted on 11/07/2009 5:16:48 PM PST by STARWISE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

We are SO lucky to have this woman on our side. :)


2 posted on 11/07/2009 5:17:56 PM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (We have a Pisher in Chief!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
“We have to think this through,” she said.

I hope she does that one day soon, and drops her pro-choice for states position.

3 posted on 11/07/2009 5:21:29 PM PST by EternalVigilance (Conservatives didn't send a message to Republicans in NY-23 -The GOP sent a message to conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
Go get em' Sarah! Palin 2012!


4 posted on 11/07/2009 5:25:31 PM PST by Art in Idaho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

And let’s not forget that they would deny health care for conservatives.


5 posted on 11/07/2009 5:31:44 PM PST by stockpirate ("if my thought-dreams could be seen. They'd probably put my head in a guillotine" Dylan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

President No. 45.

1. Elect a A Republican majority in Congress one year from now—Nov. 2010.

2. Elect Sarah Palin as our next President in Nov. 2012.

Only two things we have to do to save America.


6 posted on 11/07/2009 5:52:08 PM PST by exit82 (Democrats are the enemy of freedom. Sarah Palin is our Esther.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Not once during her address did they rise to their feet.

Just a little FYI - Perhaps, people wanted to hear every
word that she had to say, and did not want to be distracted
from her message.


7 posted on 11/07/2009 5:57:43 PM PST by savage woman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

I think Sarah DOES need to get the run-on sentences under control.

And sometimes I wish she would be more blunt. Such as: say “our enemies” instead of “some who don’t have our best interests at heart.”

PALIN/BACHMANN 2012


8 posted on 11/07/2009 6:24:39 PM PST by Arthur McGowan (In Edward Kennedy's America, federal funding of brothels is a right, not a privilege.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson