Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin
Total U.S. casualties were 3,829—549 killed. Some believe it was the bloodiest battle of World War II.

Huh? Over 13 months?

5 posted on 11/07/2009 5:57:29 AM PST by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: 2banana
Huh? Over 13 months?

The "13 months" refers to how long the Japanese had control of the Island of Attu after landing there. The actual battle to reclaim Attu lasted about twenty days.

7 posted on 11/07/2009 6:22:26 AM PST by Charles Martel ("Endeavor to persevere...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: 2banana

The casualties, per soldier involved, were some of the highest in all of WW2. That you did not know that proves it was one of The FORGOTTEN Battle of WW2.


11 posted on 11/07/2009 7:01:12 AM PST by LeonardFMason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: 2banana
Still, a helluva price to pay for an island the Japanese took as a diversion.

"It was strategically very important who controlled those islands," says Goldstein. The Americans stationed there "kept the Japanese from the West Coast and from invading the U.S. mainland.... From a strategic point of view, you can't underestimate the situation there. Look at a map! The Aleutians aren't very far from Seattle."

Hate to disagree with the historian, but who on earth would conclude you can take the US mainland from Attu???!?!?!?!?

16 posted on 11/07/2009 9:56:46 AM PST by TimSkalaBim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson