Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 2banana
Still, a helluva price to pay for an island the Japanese took as a diversion.

"It was strategically very important who controlled those islands," says Goldstein. The Americans stationed there "kept the Japanese from the West Coast and from invading the U.S. mainland.... From a strategic point of view, you can't underestimate the situation there. Look at a map! The Aleutians aren't very far from Seattle."

Hate to disagree with the historian, but who on earth would conclude you can take the US mainland from Attu???!?!?!?!?

16 posted on 11/07/2009 9:56:46 AM PST by TimSkalaBim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: TimSkalaBim

I don’t think the article meant taking the mainland of Alaska from Attu. Obviously not, Attu is a looong ways from the mainland of Alaska...at least a thousand miles away, maybe more, I’d have to look at a map.

I think it meant Attu was to be the first stepping stone of taking the Aleutian chain, once the Aleutian chain was taken, they were to be the base for taking the mainland.


19 posted on 11/07/2009 1:43:48 PM PST by sasportas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson