Posted on 11/06/2009 1:40:12 PM PST by kellynla
Islamic jihadists routinely characterize anti-terror efforts as part of a "war on Islam." But of course, there is no war on terror, and there is no war on Islam. There is just the Islamic jihad against the U.S. and the West. "Hasan Called War on Terror 'War Against Islam,' Classmate Says," by Justin Blum for Bloomberg, November 6:
Nov. 6 (Bloomberg) -- Major Nidal Malik Hasan, the Army psychiatrist accused of killing 13 people and wounding 30 others at the Fort Hood Army Base in Texas, regularly described the war on terror as "a war against Islam," according to a doctor who was in a graduate program with him. While studying for a masters degree in public health in 2007, Hasan used a presentation for an environmental health class to argue that Muslims were being targeted by the U.S. anti-terror campaign, said Val Finnell, a classmate.
"He was very vocal about the war, very upfront about being a Muslim first and an American second," said Finnell, 41, a preventive medicine doctor in Los Angeles, in an interview today. "He was always concerned that Muslims in the military were being persecuted."...
No matter what, the msm and this administration are going to have to walk up to the fact this was a terrorist attack by a mole.
What is astonishing is he didn’t even cover his feelings and yet was able to do what he wanted without anybody even acknowledging his predilections.
Of course not.
Didn't we see how quickly the FBI went out of their way to "ASSURE" us that this had nothing to do with terrorism, shortly after the incident began, much before any investigation had even begun.
That is now their (and Dept of Homeland INsecurity's) default position.
The Feebs and DHS are so in bed with the MOOZIES and don't want to upset any of DEAR LEADER's friends and associates that they will NEVER consider or call this an act of Terrorism and you can bet your last dime, the State-Run media and sadly now even FOX, will be careful to claim this is what it was.
I was so pissed at Twinkle Toes Schlep Smith yesterday I had to turn the volume off as I was getting sick and thought I'd throw something right thru the screen.
PC run amok!!!
Of the 30 some odd wars around the world, how many have muslim majorities fighting on one or both sides of the conflict?
“he did not DIRECTLY suffer PTSD but rather he was exposed by talking to OTHER soldiers who had been deployed.”
That would be a newly diagnosed “second hand PTSD”. Very deadly indeed.
You with Horse Pals?
enforced-head-in-the-sand bump.
There S/B Their
How about Fox start floating the line “terrorists don’t get PTSD”
That would be all of them.
NidalHasan scribbled: There was a grenade thrown amongs a group of American soldiers. One of the soldiers, feeling that it was to late for everyone to flee jumped on the grave with the intention of saving his comrades. Indeed he saved them. He inentionally took his life (suicide) for a noble cause i.e. saving the lives of his soldier. To say that this soldier committed suicide is inappropriate. Its more appropriate to say he is a brave hero that sacrificed his life for a more noble cause. Scholars have paralled this to suicide bombers whose intention, by sacrificing their lives, is to help save Muslims by killing enemy soldiers. If one suicide bomber can kill 100 enemy soldiers because they were caught off guard that would be considered a strategic victory. Their intention is not to die because of some despair. The same can be said for the Kamikazees in Japan. They died (via crashing their planes into ships) to kill the enemies for the homeland. You can call them crazy i you want but their act was not one of suicide that is despised by Islam. So the scholars main point is that "IT SEEMS AS THOUGH YOUR INTENTION IS THE MAIN ISSUE" and Allah (SWT) knows best.
..............
may he rot in hell with his virgins
It’s contagious. Can you get a vaccine, like for swine flu?
I object to your use of the term "Muzzie." It should not be dignified by capitalizing the first letter.
This is completely true of every Muslim in America. Their true loyalty is to the Ummah. The goal of Islam is complete domination of the world and subjection of every human to a new Caliphate. Islam is an imperialist doctrine.
Calling them “enemy soldiers”, does that make this a WAR CRIME?
Well,well, well...Faux News is covering this issue now.
.... he's right.
It is a War on Islam.
At least it is for me.
Mark Stein does a great job of shredding the pc bs and getting to reality of Islamic Killers in America and around the world:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2380112/posts
MARK STEYN: MULTICULTURAL ILLUSIONS KILL - NO STRATEGY TO DEFEND AGAINST IDEOLOGY
dakota beacon ^ | November 06, 2009 | Mark Steyn
Posted on Friday, November 06, 2009 9:36:18 AM by Mount Athos
Thirteen dead and 31 wounded would be a bad day for the US military in Afghanistan, and a great victory for the Taliban. When it happens in Texas, in the heart of the biggest military base in the nation, at a processing center for soldiers either returning from or deploying to combat overseas, it is not merely a “tragedy” (as too many people called it) but a glimpse of a potentially fatal flaw at the heart of what we have called, since 9/11, the “war on terror”. Brave soldiers trained to hunt down and kill America’s enemy abroad were killed in the safety and security of home by, in essence, the same enemy – a man who believes in and supports everything the enemy does.
And he’s a US Army major.
And his superior officers and other authorities knew about his beliefs but seemed to think it was just a bit of harmless multicultural diversity – as if believing that “the Muslims should stand up and fight against the aggressor” (ie, his fellow American soldiers) and writing Internet paeans to the “noble” “heroism” of suicide bombers and, indeed, objectively supporting the other side in an active war is to be regarded as just some kind of alternative lifestyle that adds to the general vibrancy of the base.
When it emerged early on Thursday afternoon that the shooter was Nidal Malik Hasan, there appeared shortly thereafter on Twitter a flurry of posts with the striking formulation: “Please judge Major Malik Nadal [sic] by his actions and not by his name.”
The above is an excerpt. Go to the link below for Mark’s complete oped.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2380112/posts
Yep, am listening right now. Investigation going on. Eeew, he mentioned political correctness!
“Fort Hood Shooter Regularly Described War on Terror as “War on Islam”
Guess he had more stones than Bush.
Religion of peace. PFFFT!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.