>>LOL!...it is the Temple of Darwin who are the modern day Luddites. <<
Your ignorance does not make others who understand science Luddites.
>>After all, it is your fellow anti-science Temple of Darwin co-religionists who have teamed up with the communist ACLU to prevent students from hearing about the origins debate. <<
If you have a scientific alternative to TToE, bring it. To date, there is none. Sophomoric philosophical musings such as ID do not meet even the low standard.
>>It is your evo-fanatical, anti-science, Luddite co-religionists who destroy the careers of scientists who dare to look for design in nature. It is your cowardly, anti-science, Luddite evo-coreligionists who put their tales between their legs every time they are challenged by Creationists or IDers to debate in public or in print. <<
Repeating a word like “Luddite” without understanding it is, as I said, like a 5 YO who has learned to cuss. If you have an alternative to TToE that explains the billions of datapoints, post it. Your cute little “oh look here, there is a slight variation” (followed, as always, by a complete and purposeful misanalysis of the posited phenomenon) do not cut it.
>>Talk about the pot calling the kettle black! Get real, FreeDumb!!!<<
You really need to learn terms before you accuse people of misusing them. As always, your ignorance does not create knowledge.
PS Creationists have a comprehensive, testable explanation for life's origin, whereas the evos have got zip. And in case that has produced a question mark over your FreeDumb head, the Temple of Darwin has no explanation for the origin of life! But they don't call you FreeDumb for nothing, so let me put this in a way that you might,just might, understand:
