Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne
If you’re not a knuckle dragging felon who has committed a violent act with or without a gun, you should be able to protect yourself and those around you.

The corollary is that if you can't be trusted with lethal force, you can't be trusted in public.

2,422 posted on 11/06/2009 12:26:51 PM PST by Carry_Okie (Islam offers three choices: surrender, fight, or die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2417 | View Replies ]


To: Carry_Okie

Carry_Okie, I have some sympathy for that corollary. I also see some problems with it.

Should certain acts have much stiffer penalties, ones that can’t be severely discounted? I believe so.

Should we be allowing a guy to walk out of prison one day and own a weapon the next day? I don’t think so.

If the person went to prison for a violent crime, I still think there should be an additional cooling off period after release. Did they get straight or an education in prison. When the answer to that question is clear, I’m a lot more inclined to agree or object to gun ownership.


2,428 posted on 11/06/2009 12:55:24 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Unseal the lock box containing every document pertaining to Obama's life, TODAY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2422 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson