To: Beelzebubba; kristinn; Pukadon
Here's my comparison from back then. The Matisse is on the left - the "copy was only rotated and re-sized to match. There are differences - its not an exact copy - but I now understand that if its termed "appropriation" instead of "plagiarism" then its ok. ;-)
66 posted on
11/04/2009 4:20:19 PM PST by
Tunehead54
(Nothing funny here ;-)
To: Tunehead54
The only reason it isn’t a forgery is that Matisse’s signature isn’t on it.
70 posted on
11/04/2009 4:23:33 PM PST by
usmcobra
(Your chances of dying in bed are reduced by getting out of it, but most people still die in bed)
To: Tunehead54
They look NOTHING alike!!! sarc/
71 posted on
11/04/2009 4:23:47 PM PST by
Ann Archy
(Abortion,,,,,,the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
To: Tunehead54
I now understand that if its termed "appropriation" instead of "plagiarism" then its ok. ;-)And when the Congress does it, it's "appropriation", not "stealing."
127 posted on
11/05/2009 6:52:40 AM PST by
Albion Wilde
(Obama makes Bush his blame czar. --Mark Steyn)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson