To: submarinerswife
Why should we care? Really. I wouldn't, except for the fact that he's the guy who started calling conservative activists "teabaggers."
In case you didn't know, the term "teabagger" is a vile homosexual practice. You could look it up.
26 posted on
11/04/2009 1:08:01 PM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Ask not what the Kennedys can do for you, but what you can do for the Kennedys.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
In case you didn't know, the term "teabagger" is a vile homosexual practice. You could look it up. So is chickenhawk, which they used as a pejorative to slur supporters of the war in Iraq.
54 posted on
11/04/2009 1:22:50 PM PST by
a fool in paradise
(I refuse to "reduce my carbon footprint" all while Lenin remains in an airconditioned shrine)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
In case you didn't know, the term "teabagger" is a vile homosexual practice. You could look it up. So should we call him a homo since he also has said "swallow" on the air? It is also something that homos do.
Once again, why should we care? Liberals everywhere are using the term. Should we look into who they have sex with to determine if they are gay?
86 posted on
11/04/2009 2:07:00 PM PST by
submarinerswife
("If I win I can't 't be stopped! If I lose I shall be dead." - George S. Patton)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson