Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Texas Constitutional Amendments Election (Explanatory Ballot Statements)
Texas SOS ^ | 11/03/2009

Posted on 11/03/2009 11:54:02 AM PST by BuckeyeTexan

Explanatory Statements for the November 3rd, 2009 Constitutional Amendment Election

Proposition 1 (HJR 132)

HJR 132 would amend the constitution to authorize the legislature to allow a municipality or a county to issue bonds and notes to finance the purchase of buffer areas or open spaces adjacent to military installations. The buffer areas would be used to prevent encroachment or to construct roadways utilities, or other infrastructure to protect or promote the mission of the military installation. The municipality or county may pledge increases in ad valorem tax revenues for repayment of the bonds or notes.

The proposed amendment would appear on the ballot as follows: "The constitutional amendment authorizing the financing, including through tax increment financing, of the acquisition by municipalities and counties of buffer areas or open spaces adjacent to a military installation for the prevention of encroachment or for the construction of roadways, utilities, or other infrastructure to protect or promote the mission of the military installation."

Proposition 2 (HJR 36 - #1)

HJR 36 would amend the constitution to authorize the legislature to provide for the taxation of a residence homestead solely on the basis of the property's value as a residence homestead, regardless of whether the property may have a higher value if it were used for other purposes.

The proposed amendment would appear on the ballot as follows: "The constitutional amendment authorizing the legislature to provide for the ad valorem taxation of a residence homestead solely on the basis of the property’s value as a residence homestead."

Proposition 3 (HJR 36 - #3)

HJR 36 would amend the constitution to require the legislature to provide for the administration and enforcement of uniform standards and procedures for appraisal of property for ad valorem tax purposes.

The proposed amendment would appear on the ballot as follows: "The constitutional amendment providing for uniform standards and procedures for the appraisal of property for ad valorem tax purposes."

Proposition 4 (HJR 14 - #2)

HJR 14 would amend the constitution to establish the national research university fund to provide a source of funding that will enable emerging research universities in this state to develop into major research universities. The amendment would require the legislature to dedicate state revenue to the fund and to transfer the balance of the existing higher education fund to the national research university fund. This amendment would further require the legislature to establish the criteria by which a state university may become eligible to receive and use distributions from the fund.

The proposed amendment would appear on the ballot as follows: "The constitutional amendment establishing the national research university fund to enable emerging research universities in this state to achieve national prominence as major research universities and transferring the balance of the higher education fund to the national research university fund."

Proposition 5 (HJR 36 - #2)

HJR 36 would amend the constitution to authorize the legislature to allow for a single appraisal review board for two or more adjoining appraisal entities that elect to provide for consolidated reviews of tax appraisals.

The proposed amendment would appear on the ballot as follows: "The constitutional amendment authorizing the legislature to authorize a single board of equalization for two or more adjoining appraisal entities that elect to provide for consolidated equalizations."

Proposition 6 (HJR 116)

HJR 116 would amend the constitution to authorize the Veterans' Land Board to issue general obligation bonds, subject to certain constitutional limits, for the purpose of selling land and providing home or land mortgage loans to veterans of the state.

The proposed amendment would appear on the ballot as follows: "The constitutional amendment authorizing the Veterans ’ Land Board to issue general obligation bonds in amounts equal to or less than amounts previously authorized."

Proposition 7 (HJR 127)

HJR 127 would amend the constitution to allow an officer or enlisted member of the Texas State Guard or other state militia or military force to hold other civil offices.

The proposed amendment would appear on the ballot as follows: "The constitutional amendment to allow an officer or enlisted member of the Texas State Guard or other state militia or military force to hold other civil offices."

Proposition 8 (HJR 7)

HJR 7 would amend the constitution to authorize the state to contribute money, property, and other resources for the establishment, maintenance, and operation of veterans’ hospitals in this state.

The proposed amendment would appear on the ballot as follows: “The constitutional amendment authorizing the state to contribute money, property, and other resources for the establishment, maintenance, and operation of veterans hospitals in this state.”

Proposition 9 (HJR 102)

HJR 102 would define what is a state-owned public beach. The public, individually and collectively, would have an unrestricted right to use and a right of ingress to and egress from a public beach. The amendment would authorize the legislature to enact laws to protect these rights.

The proposed amendment would appear on the ballot as follows: "The constitutional amendment to protect the right of the public, individually and collectively, to access and use the public beaches bordering the seaward shore of the Gulf of Mexico."

Proposition 10 (HJR 85)

HJR 85 would amend the constitution to authorize the legislature to provide that members of the governing board of an emergency services district may serve terms not to exceed four years.

The proposed amendment would appear on the ballot as follows: "The constitutional amendment to provide that elected members of the governing boards of emergency services districts may serve terms not to exceed four years."

Proposition 11 (HJR 14 - #1)

HJR 14 would amend the constitution to provide that the taking of private property for public use (“eminent domain”) is authorized only if it is for the ownership, use, and enjoyment of the property by the State, its political subdivisions, the public at large, or by entities granted the power of eminent domain, or for the removal of urban blight. The amendment would prohibit the taking of private property for transfer to a private entity for the purpose of economic development or to increase tax revenues. The amendment would also limit the legislature's authority to grant the power of eminent domain in the future unless it is approved by a two-thirds vote of all the members elected to each house.

The proposed amendment would appear on the ballot as follows: "The constitutional amendment to prohibit the taking, damaging, or destroying of private property for public use unless the action is for the ownership, use, and enjoyment of the property by the State, a political subdivision of the State, the public at large, or entities granted the power of eminent domain under law or for the elimination of urban blight on a particular parcel of property, but not for certain economic development or enhancement of tax revenue purposes, and to limit the legislature ’s authority to grant the power of eminent domain to an entity."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: amendment; constitution; election; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: SeeSharp

As I understand the PUF, it accounts for a small percentage of the eligible universities’ budgets. This amendment allows the legislature to define which universities would be eligible.

As long as the legislature is held by conservatives, that’s a good thing. If it’s held by liberals, then this fund could become a reward system for votes. I’m concerned about it, but you can twist my arm with more information. :) I’m open to outside influence on this one.

I hate the wiki, but here’s a link for those unfamiliar with PUF.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permanent_University_Fund


21 posted on 11/03/2009 12:41:29 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (Integrity, Honesty, Character, & Loyalty still matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan
From Dan Patrick, Senate District 7

Dear Friends,

In the coming weeks, Texans will be asked to approve several amendments to our state constitution. If you are like me, you may have begun to wonder how long our constitution can get, but that train left the station long ago. Although our constitution may be growing, the amendments that we will vote on this November, will actually reduce the scope of state government and improve its operation. Passing these amendments will do nothing less than help our service men and women, protect our military bases from encroachment, make property tax appraisals fairer and preserve the sanctity of private property rights.

There has been a lot of misinformation circulating about Propositions 2, 3, and 5. I want to clarify that these amendments will NOT create a new state property tax. I would not support a state property tax and the Texas Constitution still prohibits a state property tax. Please take the time to review the analysis below and be sure to vote. Early voting is available from October 19 through 30 and Election Day is November 3. Voting locations in Harris County can be found at this link: http://www.harrisvotes.org.

May God Bless,

22 posted on 11/03/2009 12:42:28 PM PST by TWfromTEXAS (Life is the one choice that pro choicers will not support.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick; VRWCmember

You convinced me. I’ll vote yes.


23 posted on 11/03/2009 12:42:54 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (Integrity, Honesty, Character, & Loyalty still matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

>> You convinced me. I’ll vote yes.

Excellent. IMHO #11 is the most important question on the ballot.

Mrs. Tick and I just got back from voting. Turnout was light; that’s disappointing. The silver lining in that bad news, I suppose, is that each vote has higher value.

The other good news is the Missus and I didn’t cancel each other out on anything, and we drew up our positions independently.


24 posted on 11/03/2009 12:47:22 PM PST by Nervous Tick (Stop dissing drunken sailors! At least they spend their OWN money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan
The legislature has been dominated by graduates of the UT law school and that is why the Puff has been closed off to other universities all these years. This is yet another attempt to break that monopoly.

By the way, whenever you hear legislative language that sounds like "research university this research that blah blah reaserach blah major research national research" and so on, what you are hearing is the University of Houston's lobbying team. UH has been at the forefront of efforts to open up the puff. They get a huge percentage of their funding from research grants (mostly Federal) and it's like this huge manic identity trait for them.

25 posted on 11/03/2009 1:50:15 PM PST by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan; All

http://www.christianvoterguide.com/

If you click on Texas, you will get a list of links to several different conservative organizations with their recommendations, such as David Barton with Wallbuilders, Heritage Alliance, Free Market Foundation (they actuallyjust show pro & con, not a recommendation), etc.

I looked them up and compared their recommendations. David Barton and Heritage were very similar except for 2 of the amendments where they differed. They each gave reasoning on why they advocated one or the other position for the conservative or more strict constitutional reasoning. It helped me to understand them and make my decision.


26 posted on 11/03/2009 3:28:46 PM PST by boxlunch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeeSharp
Prop 4 should be a yes.

A big fat HELL NO.

I was at Tech when it became a "research" school. The faculty became, and continues to be, indifferent to the students. You know them little people the damn school was created to serve.

27 posted on 11/03/2009 3:36:04 PM PST by Professional Engineer (Will Algore give me carbon credits for using treehuggers for home heating fuel?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: boxlunch

Thanks very much for posting that information. The more info we have to consider the better our choices become. :)


28 posted on 11/03/2009 3:44:34 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (Integrity, Honesty, Character, & Loyalty still matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Pantera; TWfromTEXAS; BoringGuy; Richard Kimball; girlscout; omegabea; Warrior_Queen; erkyl; ...

With 90% of precincts reporting at 9:30 PM local time, the results are as follows for the Texas constitutional amendment proposals.

Prop 1: Passed
Prop 2: Passed
Prop 3: Passed
Prop 4: Passed
Prop 5: Passed
Prop 6: Passed
Prop 7: Passed
Prop 8: Passed
Prop 9: Passed
Prop 10: Passed
Prop 11: Passed


29 posted on 11/03/2009 8:00:36 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (Integrity, Honesty, Character, & Loyalty still matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Crud! I left out the important fact that these numbers are from Tarrant County.


30 posted on 11/03/2009 8:13:07 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (Integrity, Honesty, Character, & Loyalty still matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Those numbers reflect the statewide results also. All of the proposals will pass.


31 posted on 11/03/2009 8:16:02 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (Integrity, Honesty, Character, & Loyalty still matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Sadly, I knew everything would pass. What looked good at first told a different tale once you actually read the bills in full. But nooooo, idiots can’t be bothered, or can’t read English or spanish (last I heard, you had to learn English for citizenship, not that that citizenship matters either). If we can’t save ourselves at the local level, we might as well hand everything over to Dear Leader and be done with it now.


32 posted on 11/04/2009 4:59:47 AM PST by bgill (The framers of the US Constitution established an entire federal government in 18 pages.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Yee Haw........:)


33 posted on 11/04/2009 5:28:21 AM PST by Dawgreg (Happiness is not having what you want, but wanting what you have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Goodness! Didn’t the voters study up on these?! My guess is “no.”


34 posted on 11/04/2009 6:39:48 AM PST by al_c (http://www.blowoutcongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bgill

“We have people who were born here, who can’t read English.” ~ per DOJ lawyer


35 posted on 11/04/2009 8:27:24 AM PST by SwinneySwitch (Mexico - beyond your expectations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

All the bonds passed in the last bond election too. It’s like pissin’ into the friggin’ wind!


36 posted on 11/04/2009 8:32:45 AM PST by SwinneySwitch (0bommaNation - beyond your expectations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch; al_c

It sure does seem like the average voter didn’t make any effort to review the actual amendments to inform themselves about that which they voted. It’s frustrating.

I should have posted this weeks ago and attempted to get the word out, but didn’t. I am guilty of being a slacker too, I guess.

The wording on the ballots doesn’t make it easy to understand what the amendments are really about. I think most assumed that a Republican-controlled state legislature wouldn’t propose amendments that weren’t good for Texas. What a mistake that philosophy is.


37 posted on 11/04/2009 9:47:37 AM PST by BuckeyeTexan (Integrity, Honesty, Character, & Loyalty still matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson