Skip to comments.
Levi Johnston 'To Take Sarah Palin To Court' Over Child Custody [The BoyFriend From Hell!]
Telegraph(UK) ^
| October 30th 2009
Posted on 10/30/2009 5:37:59 PM PDT by Steelfish
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-175 next last
To: deport
As long as I get to do a YEEHAH! at the end.
121
posted on
10/30/2009 6:37:18 PM PDT
by
rintense
(You do not advance conservatism by becoming more liberal. ~ rintense, 2006)
To: Steelfish
So, how much child support is Levi Johnston kicking in?
122
posted on
10/30/2009 6:38:06 PM PDT
by
Mike Darancette
(Obama: Grasping at Straw Men _ Not a Public Option It's a government mandate.)
To: rintense
The yeehahs are yours.......... take care.
123
posted on
10/30/2009 6:38:24 PM PDT
by
deport
To: TypeZoNegative
"butt hornets"?
Eeew.
124
posted on
10/30/2009 6:38:31 PM PDT
by
DRey
To: Marty62
If I were Sarah I would be round up the ususal legal suspects to sue this like brainless creep. He needs to learn this isnt highschool and you dont get to say anything you want and not expect repurcusions. He says The Palins had an arguement he saw and THAT meant they were getting a divorce.Legal-eagle FReepers correct me if necessary, but it seems to me that it would be unlikely the Palins could prevail in such a case, since the fact that he says he overheard an argument between them theoretically can't be proven (or disproven) unless it was somehow recorded.
125
posted on
10/30/2009 6:40:12 PM PDT
by
LaybackLenny
(Sarah Palin can see the left's heads explode from her house!)
To: potlatch
.
I’ll bet he gets picked up for a drug charge in NYC
126
posted on
10/30/2009 6:44:22 PM PDT
by
devolve
( . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "Hey - Know what? I*d like a surf & turf!" . . . . . . . . . . .)
To: Mike Darancette
Can’t speak for all fifty states, but child support and visitation rights are mutually exclusive. And to stay off the radar for paying court ordered child support, one just has to hide their income well enough, make minimal effort to pay (which resets the “naughty” clock), be unemployed or work under the table...just to mention a few
To: devolve
I don’t know, don’t know if he uses drugs. Time will tell. If he associates with entertainment people he will, if he hasn’t already.
128
posted on
10/30/2009 6:48:20 PM PDT
by
potlatch
(Actions Speak Louder Than Words)
To: wombtotomb
“That said, stripper moms and the like are looked at through the same morality lens as divorce is, and that is against Gods law as well.”
That is incorrect because although God “hates divorce” there are specific reasons that divorce is permitted in the scriptures, including if your spouse has deserted you, or if the spouse has committed adultery.
To: Sir_Ed
>> Well, its not right if hes being prevented from seeing his baby.
>> It IS his and Bristols, after all...
How long has he been prevented from seeing his baby?
130
posted on
10/30/2009 6:58:16 PM PDT
by
Gene Eric
(Speaking out against Free Speech is 'Hate Speech')
To: Pheaedrus
Excellent question.
131
posted on
10/30/2009 7:01:07 PM PDT
by
LiberConservative
("Sarah Palin irritates all the right people." -Dennis Miller)
To: FightThePower!
1. He has a right to see his kid as long as he is willing to pay child support. In many states, this is just dead wrong.
There is no linkage between visitation and child support.
To: potlatch
.
He is a creep
A shame he was even allowed near her daughter
133
posted on
10/30/2009 7:01:47 PM PDT
by
devolve
( . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "Hey - Know what? I*d like a surf & turf!" . . . . . . . . . . .)
To: Steelfish
attention whore, nothing more...
134
posted on
10/30/2009 7:04:08 PM PDT
by
Chode
(American Hedonist *DTOM* -ww- I AM JIM THOMPSON!)
To: Steelfish
This looks like a FAIL just waiting to happen.
135
posted on
10/30/2009 7:14:46 PM PDT
by
RichInOC
(No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
To: FightThePower!
Child support and visitation are not supposed to be tied. They almost always are but that’s not how it is supposed to work. One should be extremely careful about denying visitation to a deadbeat spouse without a lawyer’s advice (and IANAL).
136
posted on
10/30/2009 7:20:19 PM PDT
by
NonValueAdded
("The Democrats scare me, the GOP infuriates me.")
To: Sarah Barracuda
And the headlines will make it look like he got bumped off.
137
posted on
10/30/2009 7:24:48 PM PDT
by
Slump Tester
(What if I'm pregnant Teddy? Errr-ahh -Calm down Mary Jo, we'll cross that bridge when we come to it)
To: rintense
It doesn’t matter where Levi is, what matters is where the child currently is. Boy is this guy about to get nailed by a good lawyer. Drug abuse, modeling, and threats against the Palins is going to look great in Court. Here is the bonus, J&D courts are private proceedings and no cameras or media is allowed.
138
posted on
10/30/2009 7:29:09 PM PDT
by
ClayinVA
("Those who don't remember history are doomed to repeat it")
To: rintense
I wonder how quick Levi deposited his DNC check
139
posted on
10/30/2009 7:33:49 PM PDT
by
SoCalPol
(Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
To: Steelfish
"I'm up to the point where I can't see my kid again. I'm done. I'm sure we'll end up in court," Mr Johnston said in an interview with The Guardian today. "We're definitely going to court. They started letting me see him and everything was fine. But everything got bad again. So I said screw them. Bristol listens to her mom. Sarah says something, Bristol is going to follow." It's too bad that Bristol didn't always listen to her mom. Maybe not though, because, contrary to what Obama believes, she was rewarded with a baby!
140
posted on
10/30/2009 7:35:51 PM PDT
by
mckenzie7
(I am a European American! Silly me. I never realized that before! Thanks, oh great unifier!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-175 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson