Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LongElegantLegs

Well I guess if that’s the case then I can’t agree. He is either innocent of wrong doing because it is not against the law and therefore should require no supervision OR
what he did was wrong and the law is wrong for not punishing it and the law needs to change. I don’t think we can have it both ways.
I too am concerned about laws that affect parent and child relationships. Obviously I homeschool my 3. However, I would be MORE concerned about being supervised for something that wasn’t against the law than being punished for something that was against the law. \
It is a much slippier slope than knowing what the law and the consequences of breaking that law are.
Am I making myself clear? I have the flu and am not clear headed lol!


17 posted on 10/30/2009 1:03:34 PM PDT by christianhomeschoolmommaof3 (Best thing about Cash for Clunkers is that 90% of the Obama bumper stickers are now off the road.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: christianhomeschoolmommaof3

I think I understand! I should point out that it’s CPS that is monitoring him, not the cops. I assume they would be involved with the family anyway, because of the custody case, so it’s a question of whether or not he’s a fit guardian, not whether or not he should go to jail.
If he did make them watch porn he could lose custody, but not be charged with a crime.

It’s sad that we have to look at every little thing and ask “How will this be used against me?”, but that’s the America we live in.


19 posted on 10/30/2009 1:09:22 PM PDT by LongElegantLegs (Raise the fanged and warlike mistress, stern, impassive, weaponed mistress...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson