Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: christianhomeschoolmommaof3
"The law apparently was meant to protect the privacy of parents who wanted to teach children about sex education, but it states clearly that parents can’t be prosecuted for showing “harmful material” to their children."

I think that's the issue. Assuming this happens as is being reported, the guy is a complete dirt bag who will probably end up molesting somebody's kid. I'm glad they're supervising him.

15 posted on 10/30/2009 12:52:29 PM PDT by LongElegantLegs (Raise the fanged and warlike mistress, stern, impassive, weaponed mistress...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: LongElegantLegs

Well I guess if that’s the case then I can’t agree. He is either innocent of wrong doing because it is not against the law and therefore should require no supervision OR
what he did was wrong and the law is wrong for not punishing it and the law needs to change. I don’t think we can have it both ways.
I too am concerned about laws that affect parent and child relationships. Obviously I homeschool my 3. However, I would be MORE concerned about being supervised for something that wasn’t against the law than being punished for something that was against the law. \
It is a much slippier slope than knowing what the law and the consequences of breaking that law are.
Am I making myself clear? I have the flu and am not clear headed lol!


17 posted on 10/30/2009 1:03:34 PM PDT by christianhomeschoolmommaof3 (Best thing about Cash for Clunkers is that 90% of the Obama bumper stickers are now off the road.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson