What he did (if he did it) was wrong and screwed up, but we don’t need any more laws about what we can and can’t do with our children.
The problem is when big brother gets a foot in the door to define what is appropriate, it opens up a whole can of worms. While the core of the issue is pretty sick- (what parent in their right mind would do that?) the way big brother works, next week, someone will define classical art as pornographic.
It won’t be a minute before some of FR’s finest libertarians show up and state this is fine.
After all - we don’t need no nanny-state gubmint interfering in our lives, right?
Unbelievable! Leave the law out of it. A grandfather or uncle will know what to do with this pervert.
The accusation came from the divorced wife, after she took the kids to a counselor. The kids could very well have been coached. The mother’s word is suspect at best, when you research the story and find out that the mother originally lost custody of the kids, which is basically unheard of in TX. She had to have lost custody for a reason and now, as stated by the mother, she is seeking publicity. I’m also not surprised that CPS is going after the dad full bore. TX CPS has a rampant history of crucifying the father even if he is proven innocent or is proven to be the better parent.
How dare a parent show his children porn. Only the school teachers are allowed to do that.