Replies

It is more complicated than that. Obama, because his father was, and he is, by the British Nationality Act of 1948, a British citizen, cannot be a natural born citizen. Thus he cannot be impeached because he is not a constitutional president. He is probably a U.S. citizen, though there is even the possibility that has mother, a 60s radical, forsook U.S. citizenship and took her first husband's British citizenship.

The requirements for president are not complicated. Natural born citizenship is defined in a dozen supreme court cases and the source cited in at least four. The most concise and earliest is Minuteman, founder, delegate to the Virginia Ratification Committee, and Chief Justice of the Supreme Court John Marshall in a case named for a ship. The Venus, 12 U.S. 253, on page 289. A natural born citizen is born of the soil of parents who are its citizens. That definition has never been changed in spite of at least 24 attempts to do so, the last about ten years ago by Orren Hatch. Obama is illegitimate, and no birth certificate need be discovered, not even the one he described having found in Bill Ayres book “Dreams From My Father.”

"It is more complicated than that. ..." I understand all that, but if you want to win this battle, we need to focus on on this simple goal first: disclosure of the birth documentation on file in Hawaii. Then we can move onto related issues.

Believe me: all the "natural born" arguments are confusing the public far more than they are helping. In fact, it's apparent that Obama's stooges are counting on that confusion!!

This effort also needs a proper website to explain all this. This information is fragmented all over the place, making it less credible to people who don't understand this subject. Look how few of us were even aware of this CFP article.