Posted on 10/30/2009 6:07:00 AM PDT by MelSmith
I hope you are right. I hope Leo can make some progress. The Sauids and their allies are in control.
Great post, and sums it all up..short and sweet!
When Martial Law is implemented in the United States (at the stroke of a Presidential pen and the Attorney General’s signature on a warrant), we’ll see if the military obeys the DHS plans or not.
Thursday, January 05, 2006
The NY Times interviews the richest Arab in the world, who just gave $40m to Harvard and Georgetown, and they give Mr Midas a hard time
NY Times Interview by DEBORAH SOLOMON
Questions for Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal — Big Imam on Campus
http://adamash.blogspot.com/2006/01/ny-times-interviews-richest-arab-in.html
Perhaps you are being too harsh on the judge. If you read the posted Joan Swirsky article, you might conclude that he "was made an offer he couldn't refuse" (as per the film "The Godfather").
Yes, the hiring of that "Obama mole" was a tipoff that the integrity of the judicial process was being compromised!
So what? There have been numerous incidents of "intense violent civil unrest" throughout American history, and the country has survived all of them with its Constitution and law (at least theoretically) intact. If judges are afraid to uphold the law for fear of domestic violence, they should resign immediately. You can't preserve a republican form of government if the integrity of the judiciary is compromised by thuggery! Think of Germany in the 1930s.
Thanks js93.
In the Shadow of Leviathan: Americas’ Arising Fear-Based Society
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2369074/posts
By the time you get to #16 - connections, connections:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2371569/posts?page=16#16
SESH VALAMOOR-BARBARA MARX HOWARD-ANITA DUNN-SIDDARTH VELAMOOR-BOB BAUER-SOROS
Riots beat where we are headed. This are going to get a lot worse.
When “men” like Judge David O. Carter sell out their manhood, their honor and their country then it leads to disaster. He is a worm.
It won't happen in the foreseeable future. Though FOX is being baited by the Obama WH, Rupert Murdoch, the FOX honcho, is an insider himself. There are certain subjects that are taboo and Murdoch lets the word go out to all his employees as to what they are.
However, things could change if and when it appears that Obama is a lame duck.
Obama’s Benefactor: Dr. Khalid al Mansour, I presume ...(with video)
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/08/obamas-benefact.html
Posted on Wednesday, August 27, 2008 6:12:33 PM by hecht
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2069410/posts
Which court decision said that?
Before the main election we made the case. They said it wasn't the right time because he wasn't actually the president elect.
Which court decision said that?
Before the electoral college vote we made the case. They said it wasn't the right time because he hadn't actually been elected until the electoral college said so.
Which court decision said that?
Before the congress accepted the electoral college vote we made the case. They said it wasn't the right time because he hadn't actually been approved until the congress accepted the electoral college vote.
Which court decision said that?
Before was sworn in we made the case. They said it wasn't the right time because he hadn't actually violated the constitution until he became president.
Which court decision said that?
See #92
and
Geithner
Peter, father of Tim
http://www.columbia.edu/cu/china/PeterG.html
.
Geithner was born in Brooklyn, New York. He spent most of his childhood living outside the United States, including present-day Zimbabwe, Zambia, India and Thailand where he completed high school at International School Bangkok.
He attended Camp Becket-in-the-Berkshires-for-boys, a summer camp located in western Massachusetts. He then attended Dartmouth College, graduating with a B.A. in government and Asian studies in 1983. He earned an M.A. in international economics and East Asian studies from Johns Hopkins University’s School of Advanced International Studies in 1985. He has studied Chinese and Japanese.
Geithner’s paternal grandfather, Paul Herman Geithner (1902–1972), emigrated with his parents from Zeulenroda, Germany to Philadelphia, Pennsylvania in 1908.
His father, Peter F. Geithner, is the director of the Asia program at the Ford Foundation in New York. During the early 1980s, Peter Geithner oversaw the Ford Foundation’s microfinance programs in Indonesia being developed by S. Ann Dunham-Soetoro, President Barack Obama’s mother, and they met in person at least once.
Timothy Geithner’s mother, Deborah Moore Geithner, is a pianist and piano teacher in Larchmont, New York where his parents currently reside. Geithner’s maternal grandfather, Charles F. Moore, was an adviser to President Dwight D. Eisenhower and served as Vice President of Public Relations from 1952-1964 for Ford Motor Company.
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/09usofficials/2009-05/31/content_7955871.htm
.
S. Ann Dunham (1942–1995), mother of President Barack Obama and Maya Soetoro-Ng, earned her undergraduate, master’s, and doctoral degrees, all in anthropology, from the University of Hawai‘i at Manoa.
Dunham spent years working on rural development, microfinance, and women’s welfare through organizations including USAID, the World Bank, the Ford Foundation, the Indonesian Federation of Labor Unions, and Bank Rakyat Indonesia.
Alice G. Dewey, an Indonesianist, is Professor Emeritus of Anthropology at the University of Hawai‘i. Nancy I. Cooper is Adjunct Associate Professor of Anthropology at the University of Hawai‘i. Maya Soetoro-Ng has a doctorate in international comparative education from the University of Hawai‘i. Robert W. Hefner is Professor of Anthropology and Associate Director of the Institute on Culture, Religion, and World Affairs at Boston University. He is President of the Association for Asian Studies.
http://www.dukeupress.edu/books.php3?isbn=978-0-8223-4687-6
Ping to #92 and #94
The only branch of government with the power to remove a sitting President is the U.S.Congress.
Impeachment is reserved for legally elected officials.
The legislative branch realized usurpers occasionally made it into office and so created legislation for Quo Warranto, delegating their power to remove a President to the District Court in Wahington, D.C.
The correct avenue for removing a usurper President is via the District Court in Washington, D.C., as directed by this legislation created and passed by the Federal legislative branch.
As per Leo Donofrio:
“Because a quo warranto is the only proper action to review the eligibility of a sitting President – and because such an action requires a trial of facts - Congress empowered the DC District Court to hold such a trial (by jury if requested by either party) when the eligibility of the President (or any US national office holder) is called into question.”
“There is no political question doctrine defense available to a sitting President for a quo warranto brought in the DC District Court. This is because Congress properly exercised its Constitutional authority to review a President’s eligibility via the quo warranto statute which also provides for the removal of an ineligible person from that office if necessary.”
“The US Attorney General and the US attorney have been empowered by Congress to institute a quo warranto on their own volition. Furthermore, any person may request that these officers do the same. If consent is not given by the DOJ, section 3503 of the quo warranto statute allows an “interested person” to petition the DC District Court on its own. The Barnett plaintiffs failed to avail themselves of this option.”
“Additionally, the Department of Justice has created a genuine conflict of interest as to 3502 requests by any “third person” (meaning any citizen). By defending the President in this eligibility litigation involving quo warranto, it isn’t possible for the Department of Justice to remain impartial.”
“Therefore, either a special prosecutor must be named for purposes of allowing the Congressional intent of the quo warranto statute to be realized, or the DC District Court may waive the requirement and examine any verified petition on its own consent.”
I think FOX news should do a documentary on the birth certificate issue.
And soon the conditions will compel that it be done.
Fellow Travelers. The sad part is most and I mean most Americans have no concept of the Fellow Travelers, The Guild or any of the others.
Judge Carter’s tone certainly changed. I believe he was threatened and your scenario is plausible. But it doesn’t explain Cheney not calling for objections or a bunch of other strange happenings.
What threat could compel everyone to go along with this coup?
We need to prep for 2010 and see how deep this rabbit hole goes.
NOT!
Judge Carter was dealing with pleadings that were a bit of a legal dog's breakfast, brought to the wrong court. What he did was draw a very precise roadmap for getting this issue before the right court in the right form.
There are some things in the decision that none of us likes, but overall, this was a loss in front of a fair and restrained judge, whose directions, if heeded, will lead us where we want to go. Now, the real work begins.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.