[Lurking Libertarian]

So, in your opinion absolutely no 3rd party candidates would have any standing at all at any time? Really?

No, I take it back-- between the nominating conventions and election day, any candidate on enough state ballots to potentailly win enough electoral votes to be elected would probably have standing.

[LibertyRocks]

Thanks for that... I was gonna say, as a “Lurking Libertarian” you’d better not be dismissing 3rd parties! ;)

[MHGinTN]

What a despicable and chicken way to set the law aside ... only those powerful enough to stop your affirmative action liar will be granted standing in his court system: "... any candidate on enough state ballots to potentailly win enough electoral votes to be elected would probably have standing." The 'might makes right' methodology will be receiving lead votes, sooner rather than later.

Isn't there an upper limit to the deception faux conservatives will be granted at FR any more, Jim? This poster is one of several who claim to be conservatives yet tout this crap that it is proper to only allow legal standing only to those strong enough to threaten the system ... like a bonefide candidate such as Keyes is not allowed to have a fair election because he could not possibly get enough polling data electoral votes to be elected! That is just plain sick, and to continue to protect such crap feeders pretending to be conservatives at FR is becoming too disgusting to continue enduring.