Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Transparent OLEDs demoed
The Register ^ | 28 October 2009 | James Sherwood

Posted on 10/28/2009 10:39:45 AM PDT by ShadowAce

When the whole world’s going OLED TV crazy, how can a telly manufacturer differentiate itself? By creating a transparent model, of course.

LG_transparent_OLED

LG's transparent OLED screen apparently connected into a PC
Credit: Tech-On

Unfortunately for LG and Samsung, both firms have the same idea and recently demo'd their respective efforts in the field of see-though OLED displays at an electronics fair in Japan.

In terms of size, LG was the winner. It demoed a 15in transparent OLED screen, compared to a paltry 2in offering from Samsung. Sammy has already shown off a 4.3in version for large handheld devices - the 2in screen is for phones, apparently.

The exact technical details of either set haven't emerged, yet. But a report by Asia-based tech title Tech-On said that both sets have a light transmittance level of 30 per cent.

Samsung_transparent_OLED

Samsung rather smaller 2in transparent OLED screen

LG’s set has been designed for use in public places, the report added, while Samsung’s panel supposedly has a 176 x 220p resolution.

You can see a video of the Samsung device here.

It’s unclear if either firm has inked plans to develop transparent OLED TVs for the living room. ®


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Technical
KEYWORDS: oled
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 10/28/2009 10:39:46 AM PDT by ShadowAce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; JosephW; ...

2 posted on 10/28/2009 10:40:16 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
transparent OLED TVs for the living room

That would be cool for about 5 minutes. Then you realize that you want to see the picture, not what's behind it, and take the durn thing back.

3 posted on 10/28/2009 10:41:42 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (End the coup!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

A solution looking for a problem.................


4 posted on 10/28/2009 10:43:08 AM PDT by Red Badger (If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Just because you can do something, doesn’t mean you should.


5 posted on 10/28/2009 10:43:51 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

If it’ll help get OLED out on the open market, I’m all for it.


6 posted on 10/28/2009 10:44:16 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

It would be great for a HUD, and for an overlay guide, say to a city or inside a complex piece of machinery.

Imagine a service manual that labels every part you look at, and highlights the ones of interest.


7 posted on 10/28/2009 10:44:31 AM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 279 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
That would be cool for about 5 minutes. Then you realize that you want to see the picture, not what's behind it, and take the durn thing back.

It has no place in the living room. Now as a heads-up-display overlay on your car windshield, it has a lot of potential.

8 posted on 10/28/2009 10:50:50 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (Public healthcare looks like it will work as well as public housing did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625
Now as a heads-up-display overlay on your car windshield, it has a lot of potential.

When Saturn was in it's incancy as a new auto company, they were going to do just that with their vehicles in 1982.
9 posted on 10/28/2009 10:53:02 AM PDT by RandallFlagg (30-year smoker, E-Cigs helped me quit, and O wants me back smoking again?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg

Infancy.
ugh!


10 posted on 10/28/2009 10:53:33 AM PDT by RandallFlagg (30-year smoker, E-Cigs helped me quit, and O wants me back smoking again?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625
It has no place in the living room. Now as a heads-up-display overlay on your car windshield, it has a lot of potential.

Not till they get the transmittance percentage up and not even then if the device has the physical ability to become opaque. Can you imagine driving 75 down the freeway and Windows-Car Blue screens and so does your car?

11 posted on 10/28/2009 10:57:39 AM PDT by Still Thinking (If ignorance is bliss, liberals must be ecstatic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

Oops. Make that “Car Windows (tm)”


12 posted on 10/28/2009 10:58:14 AM PDT by Still Thinking (If ignorance is bliss, liberals must be ecstatic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
A solution looking for a problem.................

Electronic window treatments. Or, an enhancing magic mirror on the wall.

13 posted on 10/28/2009 11:01:18 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine (Is /sarc really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
Or, an enhancing magic mirror on the wall.

Helen Thomas: "Mirror, mirror, on the wall...."

14 posted on 10/28/2009 11:09:39 AM PDT by TexasRepublic (Socialism is a parasite that kills the host)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TexasRepublic

Oh, you mean so the mirror can crack, and electronically “heal” itself in case the next gazer is better looking than Helen? (Like, you know, 99.99999999% of all humans)


15 posted on 10/28/2009 11:21:04 AM PDT by Still Thinking (If ignorance is bliss, liberals must be ecstatic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Now someone should stack a bunch of them together into a cube. Cubevision, CubeTV, I call dibs on those two names. Royalties here I come!


16 posted on 10/28/2009 11:25:46 AM PDT by kenth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg

Saturn wasn’t founded until 1985.


17 posted on 10/28/2009 11:26:26 AM PDT by krb (Obama is a miserable failure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg

Oh I see...they were leaking their vision as far back as 1982 though.


18 posted on 10/28/2009 11:28:00 AM PDT by krb (Obama is a miserable failure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg
When Saturn was in it's incancy as a new auto company, they were going to do just that with their vehicles in 1982.

Incancy? Is that a car than can cast magic spells? ;-)

19 posted on 10/28/2009 11:28:04 AM PDT by Still Thinking (If ignorance is bliss, liberals must be ecstatic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: krb

Yeah. They started the process back then in ‘82. They weren’t founded yet, and were just getting started.

What they envisioned and what they ended up making are far different creatures.


20 posted on 10/28/2009 11:34:58 AM PDT by RandallFlagg (30-year smoker, E-Cigs helped me quit, and O wants me back smoking again?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson