Posted on 10/28/2009 6:24:21 AM PDT by nuconvert
If vindication means anything its name is spelled George Bush.
As former U.S. president George W. Bush spoke to a Saskatoon audience, I stood in the wings, sneaking a peek through the curtains at the spectators beyond the footlights.
The crowd was friendly to be sure. But more than that, the relationship was like a musical virtuoso carrying the audience through every nuance, crescendo and dynamic of a composition.
With every pause, smile, laugh and down stroke of seriousness, Bush had the crowd in his hand.
Before the show, a friend who recently dined with the former Texas governor and two-term president put it bluntly: "Whatever you think you're going to see with this guy -- good or bad -- your reaction will be anywhere from pleasantly surprised to completely blown away."
Bush was open, charming, humble and self-deprecating. But as he spoke, the internal voice asked: "How is this guy the same evil manipulator who 'stole' the 2000 election from poor Al Gore?"
As the 43rd president talked about events and decision-making, accountability and principles -- not only within political life but also within ourselves -- he was passionate and uncompromising.
As Bush spoke of families held together by love, of HIV-AIDS projects in Africa and of educational reform designed to raise up the most vulnerable of children, was this the same moron, the dark and shifty war criminal we've been treated to in the mainstream media?
How could this be the same bumbling klutz, the man-child of spoonerisms that the smarmy David Letterman mocked on television every night?
As the president spoke of regrets, the intelligence reports and legal options open to fight an enemy that had declared war on America, where was this one-dimensional warmongering puppet so demonized by filmmaker Michael Moore and the truthers and haters on the Internet?
Was this guy on stage talking about dissidents, free speech and opening Middle Eastern dialogue through a commitment to free elections and democracy really the same shallow ideologue that the editorial boards of major U.S. newspapers, CNN, NBC and CBS told us he was?
My impression -- both from a couple of personal conversations with Bush and hearing him speak -- was that this is an essentially decent man with more charisma than any rock star will ever have.
While the media can do some creative editing and taking out of context, the cartoon-like George Bush of modern hate culture can't simply be made up. So how can this be the same man? Easy.
Speaking style is one thing. A passionate and articulate speaker, Bush lacks the natural eloquence and polish of a Bill Clinton.
Having now spent time with both former presidents, Clinton has an almost supernaturally smooth, flawless ad-libbed delivery and the ability -- on the fly and without a note -- to weave in often abstruse concepts alongside the banal and make it all sound like poetry.
Bush is an engaging speaker but more lineal and direct. And occasionally he stumbles. In 90 minutes Bush tripped twice -- once referring to the "universality of freedom" as the "university of freedom." Another stumble had him invert idealistic and ideologue.
Clinton doesn't do this. He can make a take-out menu sound like the Magna Carta. The problem is when Clinton's done and you reflect on his words, it's still a menu.
Bush's speech was much more memorable for the audience. But the hate-bloggers and YouTube gang can clip three seconds of the Bush stumbles and the story repeats itself.
Bush also has a directness of speech -- unlike the circuitous Clinton delivery -- that comes to a point, often abruptly. When you hear the premise, argument and reasoning, the blunt point is very effective. But the point, taken alone, can make the speaker -- particularly when he is George Bush -- sound simple.
And, seeming not to care that it'll end up in the hands of his enemies, Bush pokes fun at himself with the cleverness, edge and abandon of good standup comedy. As he unloads hilarious quips about how hated or dumb he is, Bush plays into the hands of detractors by actually repeating many of the same things they've said about him.
As people filed out after Bush's speech there were as many "wows" and glowing adjectives as at a Michael Buble concert -- and that's a lot.
Most telling was the early 20s woman who looked shocked, visibly open-mouthed, as she confessed how confused she was by what she had expected and how impressed she was by the experience.
For those who either admired president Bush throughout his term or thought there was something more substantive underneath the hatchet jobs of Hollywood and the Beltway, vindication is a good word. Things aren't always as they seem. You were right all along about George W. Bush.
“...why the sudden interest in Canada,GW was in Montreal last week...”
Don’t know what you mean by “sudden”. Canada has definitely made a turn to the Right, so it’s a good time to go.
I just found out last night that he will be coming to Mobile to speak at Mobile College....I’m already sucking up to a friend of mine who will be “buying” a table at the banquet hoping I get a seat!!!! I love this man and yes, I sure as hell do miss him....
Waaa!!! It's all the media's fault!! Waaaaaa!!
The press attacked Reagan relentlessly and he left office as one of the most popular presidents and won re-election with one of the most lopsided electoral landslides in history
You all are getting into the same game as the liberals; "if only Bush spoke better." Liberals also believe if they just speak the "right" way, you will buy their horrible policies. Listen to the new term, "Competitive Option" being used to try and sell Government run healthcare You nailed it, Sickoflibs. We ended up in 2008 with the two worst candidates to run for the WH in 2008 and elected the soon to be the worst president in history because of the performance of President Bush and the GOP under him.
Open borders with an attempt at amnesty, two nation building wars, a new Medicare drug entitlement, debt, ect. ect.
I'm not saying that Bush was representative of all that's evil. He is representative with what's wrong with the GOP
I don't think too many conservatives here or anywhere else for that matter were all that upset about his lack of notable verbal and oratory skills.
What we WERE upset about was his almost total lack of any vigor whatsoever in defending himself, his programs and his political party against the slanders and calumies of the Left in general and the Democrats and liberal media in particular.
This lack was damaging in the extreme to all the three entities noted above......no matter how it's glossed over now.
If, indeed, he is rising to greater vocal, critical and analytical heights today when he speaks before private audiences it's still little comfort to those of us who vividly remember all the vicious onslaughts by the Left during the Bush years with no one, including the President, on both defense and offense except for conservative radio and TV talk show personalities and pundits.
GOP party leaders were just as mute and culpable.
Leni
Wow. When did conservatives start giving A's for effort and intentions over actual results?
I am guessing that if W’s teleprompter broke, he could still stay on message.
He did. But you weren’t watching closeup. You bought the picture that Michael Moore and MSNBC and Letterman painted for you.
The Bush that this writer heard is the same Bush that Texans elected and elected again and who went to Washington and did a good job under extreme hardship.
The bigger question is why so many FReepers were duped into demonizing this good man. The vitriol is still over-the-top.
Maybe it took an 0 presidency to begin to bring the picture into focus.
God bless you, George W. Bush, and thank you for your service.
I couldnt wait till Bush was out of office. I dont miss him a bit. He was poison. At least with Obama we know who are opponent is. With your hero GWB he claimed to represent conservatism and capitalism while destroying the names of both. He even got republican trust levels for national defense down to 20s. Liberal lies?? He got almost everyone to dislike and distrust him.
Then where are they?
The economic collapse can be laid directly at the feet of a bunch of Democrats and the truth is that Bush tried to warn congress--more than once.
...which does not excuse Bush for signing the fascist bailout bill and opening the doors to more fascism and Socialism by successor administrations.
Now, why is it that you hate Bush?
Now, why is is that you shill for RINOs?
Is it because you don't know any better?
And...if you loved Bush, you'll love Romney!
W was forced to compromise his domestic agenda in order to continue congressional funding for the war on terror. I don’t even know how many votes were taken to de-fund the Iraq war. Amnesty was his major flaw.
Then why did he push for mass amnesties of illegal aliens, effectively spitting upon the sovereignty of the United States and of her fifty constituent States?
No. I painted my own picture. I don't need Moore or Letterman or MSNBC, which I don't watch, to tell me what I saw with my own eyes. Just like I don't need them today to piss on my leg and tell me it's raining when it comes to current WH occupant
LOL, thanks. This is typical Bush-bot crap. I thought these bots were gone.
It's just not one of Bush's natural talents, but I think it was mostly speaking in front of a press that had a deep hatred for him. Bush was forced to think and rethink every word two or three times to guard against saying anything that the biased media could twist against him.
No! Go away, Bush! And take your RINO buddies with you!
Bush’s policies, and Captain Queeg got us Obama.
McCains campaign looked like he deliberately lost to Obama.
Still does!
“Then why did he push for mass amnesties of illegal aliens, effectively spitting upon the sovereignty of the United States and of her fifty constituent States? “
Yeah, I wanna hear the defense for that one. Nobody promoted illegal immigration more than W.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.