Well, I actually followed the link to the real letter on his site and while the content is real I think somebody else lined up the letters.
nice sentiment though
Arnold has plausible deniability here. Go to http://gov.ca.gov/press-release/13575/ and scroll down to AB1176. Then click on the See attached veto message link and you'll indeed find the veto message with the letters lined up as posted above.
But if you instead click on the AB1176 link, and then scroll down to the bottom of that page and click on the Veto Message, you'll see the same wording with different formatting which obscures the hidden meaning.
So yeah, either Arnold or one of his staff members played with the formatting to make it come out just so. But they can claim that it was purely coincidental, and point to the other version as evidence to that effect.
I'll be curious to see how long it stays up when word gets out. I took a screen shot just in case, and I suggest others do likewise.
Look again......under “2009 Legislative Bill Update” then “Press Releases” then “Legislative Update 4” then go to the bottom, find AB 1176 and hit “Attached Veto Message.”
http://gov.ca.gov/index.php?/press-release/13575/