Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sans-Culotte
From your #7:

"...and have usually found him a tad too immature to listen to him regularly."

And, since I was talking about Beck, nothing in my post discussed anything about me, but thanks for your kind thoughts.

35 posted on 10/27/2009 7:43:40 AM PDT by MizSterious (Do you not think an angel rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm? John Page, 1744-1808)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: MizSterious
I guess those folks—and you—can continue to watch O’Reilly dance around the truth (while hardly ever admitting it), and talking heads on the other networks stomping all over it—all very slick, smooth, and without any voices cracking or errant tears.

In that part of your post above, you felt compelled to go on a "you can't handle the truth!" type of rant.

Then, your final sentence again implies that I care nothing for truth, but, you, in your infinite wisdom and specialness, do:

Some would trade truth for that, I suppose. Not me.

I have no idea how my finding Beck a "tad childish" should make you think "I care nothing for truth", or that I even watch O'Reilly. I stated that I thought Beck does a good job over-all and that Obama would have been wise to ignore him. Seriously, you don't find Beck a "tad childish"? Not even a little? If you don't, that's fine with me. But if you do, I can assure you, I will not think it is because you care nothing for truth.

43 posted on 10/27/2009 8:05:48 AM PDT by Sans-Culotte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson