Skip to comments.
Hatch: 'I hope' Obama not delaying troop decision to help Corzine and Deeds
Politico ^
| 10/26/09
| Eamon Javers
Posted on 10/25/2009 10:52:33 PM PDT by freespirited
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Utah Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch brought up a claim he said "some people" have made, that President Barack Obama is waiting until after this year's gubernatorial election in New Jersey and Virginia before making a decision on sending more troops to Afghanistan. There ain't no other reason. He's afraid of suppressing RAT turnout if he announces the decision before the VA and NJ elections.
To: freespirited
There ain't no other reason. He's afraid of suppressing RAT turnout if he announces the decision before the VA and NJ elections.Then his political instints are as bad as his economic instincts. Deeds is a lost cause for the donques, and Corzine nearly so, so he's wasting his time in an exercise in futility, while our troops hang in the balance. What a maroon!!
the infowarrior
To: freespirited
DEMS ALWAYS ESCALATE WARS.
To: infowarrior
There are also a lot of downticket races that RATS are worried about losing if their moonbat base doesnt show up.
4
posted on
10/25/2009 11:08:20 PM PDT
by
freespirited
(Liberals are only liberal about sex & drugs. Otherwise, they want to control your life. --DHorowitz)
To: freespirited
"outrageous … that partisans in this country would say that the President of the United States" is delaying the decision on troops for political reasons.As opposed to Bush/Cheney/Halliburton/Big Oil/Iraq? It's now outrageous to accuse the president of such things?
5
posted on
10/25/2009 11:08:50 PM PDT
by
Jeff Chandler
(Hear us, O Bama: Mmm, mmm, mmm.)
To: freespirited
Everybody across this world who cheered on the democrats in the last national election, and shouted relief when republicans were defeated, please remember in your old age what happened in the 3-4 years that followed. I hope it is good, but believe it may be otherwise.
6
posted on
10/25/2009 11:09:14 PM PDT
by
Tax Government
(Mighty nuts from tiny Acorns grow.)
To: Jeff Chandler
Well, it's not to support Deeds, The Kenyan already threw him under the bus. He did that so he could say, "It's not about me, he wouldn't even follow my advice."
That race is a referendum on The Obammunist.
yitbos
7
posted on
10/25/2009 11:22:13 PM PDT
by
bruinbirdman
("Those who control language control minds.")
To: freespirited
I can't help thinking it is the other way around . He is not going to send enough troops and fears the backlash from all Americans who are concerned about giving our troops the man power and resources to get the job done .
8
posted on
10/26/2009 12:19:34 AM PDT
by
kbennkc
(For those who have fought for it freedom has a flavor the protected will never know F/8 Cav)
To: freespirited
There ain't no other reason. He's afraid of suppressing RAT turnout if he announces the decision before the VA and NJ elections. A decision might also hurt Obama's many many fundraisers.
9
posted on
10/26/2009 1:40:23 AM PDT
by
Need4Truth
(Who can reprogram the Branch Carbonians?)
To: Jeff Chandler
Nothing a good caning couldn't solve.
Long for the old days, guys Preston Brooks and Aaron Burr knew how to keep the other side in check.
10
posted on
10/26/2009 1:44:01 AM PDT
by
Rome2000
(OBAMA IS A COMMUNIST CRYPTO-MUSLIM)
To: freespirited
Senator Hatch better be watching his back. He could end up having a car accident, plane crash or heart attack if he keeps putting the heat on Obama.
11
posted on
10/26/2009 1:47:20 AM PDT
by
uncitizen
(I'm mad as hell and i'm not gonna take it anymore!!)
To: freespirited
Politics above the lives of military service personnel.
I know Barry sleeps very well at night......
12
posted on
10/26/2009 4:08:31 AM PDT
by
cranked
To: Nachum; 444Flyer; mojitojoe; amom; joygrace
To: freespirited
"outrageous … that partisans in this country would say that the President of the United States" is delaying the decision on troops for political reasons.""
How stupid is that?
Last week the Obama administration bent over backwards explaining that they were doing exactly that! Delaying the decision based on the outcome of the Afghan election. That's not political? I'll bet the Afghans disagree !
14
posted on
10/26/2009 5:20:01 AM PDT
by
crescen7
(game on)
To: NoObamaFightForConservatives; MestaMachine; Saoirise; 1COUNTER-MORTER-68; mojitojoe
15
posted on
10/26/2009 8:35:29 AM PDT
by
444Flyer
("Permission to engage the enemy Sir! " " Permission denied." (Under CIC Obamao.))
To: 444Flyer
That is just beyond the word sad. I just heard Barry is having high level meetings right now on Afghanistan.
To: NoObamaFightForConservatives
“...I just heard Barry is having high level meetings right now on Afghanistan.”
Is he involving Code Pink, Bono and Bill Ayers in the meetings?
17
posted on
10/26/2009 8:56:08 AM PDT
by
444Flyer
("Permission to engage the enemy Sir! " " Permission denied." (Under CIC Obamao.))
To: 444Flyer
To: NoObamaFightForConservatives
Rahmmie is enough.
![]()
19
posted on
10/26/2009 9:12:40 AM PDT
by
444Flyer
("Permission to engage the enemy Sir! " " Permission denied." (Under CIC Obamao.))
To: 444Flyer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson