Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Next Non-Stimulus bill Elements Evidenced from House Democrat and Economist Press Conference
Alias: Son House | Oct 25, 2009 | Alias: Son House

Posted on 10/25/2009 8:19:38 AM PDT by Son House

Last week Democrat held a Economic Forum behind closed doors. The Economist came out and held a news conference providing evidence to the discussion, it is linked at the bottom here for the full text.

Robert Kuttner

"you need to think about reduction of debt relative to the GDP as a 10-year project and in order to get the economy back on track, we may well need, we do need, more deficit spending now and in the next year but with a pre commitment to deficit reduction over 10 years through progressive taxation,

one of the things we seem to agree on is a financial transactions tax, taxes aimed at the people who are still making out in this crisis so that the benefit can go to ordinary people and we don’t have to sacrifice the recovery on the long term/short term deficit reduction."

^
A tax on IRA's and 401k's

Robert Kuttner

"I think just about everyone in the room feels there needs to be more stimulus, and not after the State of the Union Address, but very soon because otherwise, you end up with a jobless recovery for years to come."

^
This is why all that Small Business talk. Everything in that new bill better be for all business, or obviously, it's too little to late, as it is now. Medium and Big Business are great customers for Small business and Jobs. Small business owners also file taxes as individuals, will that be address or just taxed?

Heather Boushey

“One of the key problems facing the country right now is the massive unemployment and not only are so many folks unemployed but so many folks who have lost their jobs are unable to get back in the workforce.”

^
Unable to get back in the work force? Thanks 111th United States Congress, who worked so hard to convince us their Stimulus bill would provide Jobs!

Boehner on the Dems' Economic Forum: Where Are the Jobs?
http://www.earnedmedia.org/jboe1021.htm

"American small businesses and families continue to struggle and they continue to ask the question, 'where are the jobs?' As you've heard, Speaker Pelosi is convening a panel of economists -- the same economists who gave them advice on their stimulus bill.

Maybe they'll actually look at what's happened and realize that it hasn't worked because American families are still asking, 'where are the jobs?

"This problem that we have is being exacerbated by the Democrat Majority. Put yourself in the shoes of a small business person. They're looking at a national energy tax being proposed by the Democrats. They're looking at this government takeover of health care that's going to tax small employers who don't provide health care for their employees -- that many of them can't afford to.



And, there's no real clear vision about they are going to do in terms of raising taxes. Yes, there's this major tax increase in their health care bill.

But how about the 15 percent capital gains rate that is supposed to go to 20 next year? How about the top rate that is expected to go up three and a half points next year? How about the tax on dividends that's going up next year?


Heather Boushey
“So a couple of the key themes that there was a lot of consensus on was extending unemployment insurance, making sure benefits don’t run out at the end of the year, and also making sure that those folks who are unemployed have access to health care..”

^
Unemployment Insurance to be extended till "the end of the year, Dec 2010?
Everyone has access to healthcare, including the emergency room, so it's really about Health Insurance being added to their new and improved Stimulus bill.


Heather Boushey

“A couple of other things, thinking about the long-term unemployed and folks who just can’t get jobs right now, need to do more about job training, start thinking about public service.”

^
Think about Public Service? Public Service in an Economic Stimulus bill? Strange, is that ideology driven?

And now the Economist let something slip that should have been all over the media

Former Federal Reserve Vice Chairman Alan Blinder

"despite the fact that we’re looking at an absolutely horrendous long-term fiscal outlook,"

^
Horrendous definition
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/horrendous
hor·ren·dous (hô-rnds, h-) adj. Hideous; dreadful:

Adj. 1. horrendous - causing fear or dread or terror; "the awful war"; "an awful risk"; "dire news"; "a career or vengeance so direful that London was shocked"; "the dread presence of the headmaster"; "polio is no longer the dreaded disease it once was"; "a dreadful storm"; "a fearful howling"; "horrendous explosions shook the city"; "a terrible curse"

This is their own Democrat Economist calling their budgeting "horrendous" after the House Democrat Majority has been doing the budgeting since Jan 3, 2007;
Alan Blinder was appointed to the Federal Reserve Board by President Clinton; work on Gore and Kerry Presidential Campaigns.
Of course the state run media wants to omit this Economic Forum Press 'News'Conference. It doesn't help Democrats sell their next Non-Stimulus bill.

Transcript of Pelosi, House Democratic Leaders, and Economists’ Press Conference Following Economic Forum
http://www.realestaterama.com/2009/10/22/transcript-of-pelosi-house-democratic-leaders-and-economists%C3%A2%E2%82%AC%E2%84%A2-press-conference-following-economic-forum-ID06137.html

I couldn't even find a domestic link to Former Federal Reserve Vice Chairman Alan Blinder Video till about Friday

http://www.reuters.com/news/video?videoId=113456&newsChannel=newsOne

Blinder: US economy "pretty bad"
(03:33) Rough Cut

Oct. 21 - Princeton economist and former Federal Reserve vice chairman Alan Blinder said the GDP is growing, but jobs are "still shrinking and are likely to shrink for a while yet."

Speaking to reporters after participating in an economic forum with lawmakers at the U.S. Capitol, Blinder said that "despite the fact that we are looking at an absolutely horrendous long-term fiscal outlook," he advocates at least a modest increase in the deficit, targeted on the creation of jobs.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: elements; next; nonstimulus; suicide; vanity
The next element should be across the board tax cuts. Tax rates that are also skewed to the high income business and individuals who invest and create Jobs.
1 posted on 10/25/2009 8:19:40 AM PDT by Son House
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Son House
The next element should be across the board tax cuts. Tax rates that are also skewed to the high income business and individuals who invest and create Jobs.

Won't happen until at least 2010.

2 posted on 10/25/2009 8:23:20 AM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS
And that includes ALL taxes masked as something else like “fees” ect.
3 posted on 10/25/2009 8:25:16 AM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS

Yep, think I mentioned to you before House Democrats are probably only going to get this done if they rid themselves of Pelosi as Speaker, and prepare to over-ride the expected Presidential Veto


4 posted on 10/25/2009 8:28:49 AM PDT by Son House (OcarterCare by Congress will make all Americans = Wards of the State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Son House

Raising taxes is EXACTLY the opposite of what needs to be done with an economy slipping into a Depression.

Leave it to the government to get it wrong once again!


5 posted on 10/25/2009 9:16:19 AM PDT by Deo volente (This administration is a national emergency. A quarantine is in order.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Son House

tax my 401k?

whatever. talk about revolt!


6 posted on 10/25/2009 9:20:05 AM PDT by Principled (Get the capital back! NRST!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Principled

Robert Kuttner
“one of the things we seem to agree on is a financial transactions tax, taxes aimed at the people who are still making out in this crisis so that the benefit can go to ordinary people”

^
It’s an indirect way of taxing a 401k, they tax the transaction by a broker trading, you know those evil Capitalist on Wall Street?


7 posted on 10/25/2009 9:26:26 AM PDT by Son House (OcarterCare by Congress will make all Americans = Wards of the State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Son House
...more deficit spending now and in the next year but with a pre commitment to deficit reduction over 10 years through progressive taxation...

Just ONE more drink, before I dry out...

Insanity. If this is the Democrat Policy heading into the next two election cycles the GOP doesn't need to do anything, and that's not good.

8 posted on 10/25/2009 11:15:55 AM PDT by Prospero (non est ad astra mollis e terris via)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Son House
Listen and listen good... there is NO WAY that Uncle Sugar will keep its greedy hands off zillions of dollars locked away in 401(k) plans. They will pass legislation to either tax that money to hell or convert it into extended benefits under the sinking Social Security program. Either way, DON'T think you will be retiring on those dollars. If you are lucky, you'll have 30-40% of them left when Sugar is finished with you...
9 posted on 10/25/2009 10:47:30 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson