Replies

It fits right in with the mentality of telling people to keep their faith out of the public square, where the Constitution says it's protected.

People have been trying to keep the creation posts off of FR all together, if they fail at that, then the next effort is to “keep them in the religion forum where they belong”. But that doesn’t work either and for good reason. In both links this message is crystal clear. And if you’re whining about the 10% of the time that creationists are fighting back the liberals that attack creationists 90% of the time, (and that’s being very very generous...)

Right, pointing out that these threads are intentionally kept out of the publicly-viewable Religion forum so both sides can engage in bad behavior is the same as saying you must keep your religion out of public view.

And tpanther, it says a lot that you view anyone who disagrees with you as liberal. Anyone who's viewed GGG's threads knows both sides give it. It most certainly isn't 10%-90%. Can I assume you are one of those who believes you must hold a literal creationist view to be a "true" Christian?

My faith in Jesus Christ is in no way dependent on a literal interpretation of Genesis, any more than it depends on a belief in spontaneous generation or any other discredited theory. Whether evolution turns out to be a correct theory, my belief in Jesus Christ will remain.

Again, the bad behavior is from the evolutionist side of the aisle. Again, it’s the evolutionist side of the aisle that attempts to shut down debate by not diuscussing the actual articles, but whines about them being where they “shouldn’t be”, or spews liberal nonsense about “religious attacks on science” ad nauseum, ad infinatum.

In case you missed it, FR is a conservative forum and it’s obvious you missed the two links and their relevance to your extremely liberal take on placement of GGG’s posts.

And no your assumptions are wrong, as was already pointed out, you don’t have to believe in scripture a certain way, however it’s obviously a disconnected view, (as was also pointed out), to believe in evolution, the way it is understood, “taught” (more like indoctrinated) or defined and also be a Christian.

As I said 90-10% was being generous.

It’s your side of the aisle that constantly gets banned, and then pushes the envelope with “Christian taliban” comments on 9-11-09 no less.

And that’s not even addressing the outright lies, strawmen, endless projections and various other evo-liberal behavior we see on these threads daily.

I call out liberalism wherever and whenever I see it...like liberals that defend the NEA indoctrination going on in public schools, or anyone that demands posts be posted in some other forum “where it belongs” when the owner has already clearly indicated several times, will not stand.