[This_far]

They’ll limit spending (Snow) so long as it’s covered by Federal Tax Payers.

Bull

[ThePatriotsFlag]

ping

[randita]

Some “Circus” judge will probably just declare it unconstitutional or discriminatory or some such. But it’s a good thought and might make an impression on spendthrift politicians.

[Wonder Warthog]

The Washington parasites are in full howl against this. Commercials, yard signs, everywhere “against”. I plan to vote for it.

[patriot preacher]

Even some blue states - due to the sheer weight of Federal tyranny - are going to start invoking the 10th Amendment and sayinf “no” to Washington at some point. Unless they find a way to force the Red States and repsonsible citizens to foot all the bills for them (which USUALLY happens now anyway)

[ProtectOurFreedom]

Utterly useless. Over the decades, I’ve seen many such spending limit gimmicks, most recently by Arnold here in CA. Governments at all levels blithely ignore them and continue to happily bankrupt the nation.

This won’t stop until we have our own Bastille Day complete with guillotine.

[sionnsar]

Say WA? Evergreen State ping

Quick link: WA State Board

FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this ping list.
Ping sionnsar if you see a Washington state related thread.

[4woodenboats]

Nonetheless, Washington's Democratic Gov. Christine Gregoire said recently that Tabor would be "devastating" to her state because it has a $9 billion operating deficit this year.

And yet she won the last election claiming a huge surplus (thanks to her).