You can take your personal attacks and stick ‘em where the sun don’t shine. I won’t compromise now or ever on national security, any more than any conservative would be willing to compromise now or ever on same sex marriage or abortion. Willingness to compromise on conservatism is what got us our top tier RHINO candidates, including the McCain/Palin ticket.
I was not asking you to VOTE for anyone that was not “perfect” was I?
I repeat, your attitude is counter productive.
The majority of the voting public is not 100% behind the conservative cause.
However, more people count themselves as “conservative” as opposed to “liberal” if those are the two choices. This remains true when the term “moderate” is thrown in there, as well.
YOU make the error of believing that we do not NEED moderate voters to vote for conservatives.
YOU are wrong, in that belief.
There is a HUGE difference between being tough on candidates, and being tough, even mean spirited, towards the supporters of a candidate.
Yes, sometimes, we can get a clue as to a who a candidate is by there supporters, if we have nothing else to go on.
However, there is NO excuse for bashing Armey when Dick Armey is NOT on the ballot anywhere, and when Dick Armey is trying to help the conservative cause with his endorsement of Hoffman.
I still question your attitude, your strategy, and your political maturity.
As long as the candidate is CONSERVATIVE, why tell liberals or moderates or RINO’s that they are not allowed to help that candidate?
That IS what you are doing.