To: GodGunsGuts
Because I maintain:
If you really want to get at truth, you always have to look at both sides.
...I am supposedly "an AIDS alarmist, a Flu alarmist, an evo-atheist sympathizer," and I also "came here to shill for the global warming alarmists as well?"
Really?
And here I thought that listening to both sides of a matter before judging was only wisdom. Hmm.
He who answers before listening — that is his folly and his shame... The first to present his case seems right, till another comes forward and questions him. (Proverbs 18)
By the way, you still have failed to account for your behavior which shames the name of Christ.
185 posted on
10/25/2009 6:59:29 PM PDT by
john in springfield
(One has to belong to the intelligentsia to believe such things.No ordinary man could be such a fool.)
To: john in springfield; count-your-change; Agamemnon
Sorry, I forgot to include the people you pinged for your latest accusation.
186 posted on
10/25/2009 7:00:32 PM PDT by
john in springfield
(One has to belong to the intelligentsia to believe such things.No ordinary man could be such a fool.)
To: john in springfield; GodGunsGuts
Wow! I missed a bunch. Apparently, GGGs is trying to shut down any posts that he does not author. His boss must have upped the ante before he gets paid this week.
188 posted on
10/25/2009 7:07:26 PM PDT by
ColdWater
("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
To: john in springfield
Conservatives have looked at both sides of the global warming issue, and we have concluded it is a sham being pushed by socialist environmentalists to gain control over the global economy. Then there are leftist, evo-atheist sympathizers like yourself, who keep encouraging conservatives to reconsider their position on global warming by continually pointing them to leftist, global warming alarmist sources such as wikipedia.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson