Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Do Americans Believe About Creationism and Evolution?</
john in springfield | 10/23/2009 | jis (vanity)

Posted on 10/23/2009 8:18:13 PM PDT by john in springfield

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 441-453 next last
To: RFEngineer

It depends on the modifier. Communist and a hard-left “education” are bad (such as the reeducation one would receive at an Ivy League school, a UC school, etc). It can be useful if you plan to use their education against them, as do so many conservatives, creationists, and IDers. But even then, that option takes a back seat to a truly good education, such as are taught at our top Conservative and Christian private schools. This is precisely why the more education you get from our leftist universities, the more like you are to vote for Obama, or believe darwood’s evo-religious creation myth.


121 posted on 10/24/2009 3:22:00 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

DC does seem to be the roost of many of the disruptive types
here.


122 posted on 10/24/2009 3:29:57 PM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: count-your-change

Real spoilers, in more ways than one.


123 posted on 10/24/2009 3:36:17 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts; Fichori; Admin Moderator
Hey GGG, it gets better! He's even grumbling about you!

Mar 13, 2009 From Darwin Central, Whattajoke writes this diminutive description of Fischori, a Freeper, and he pisses all over FR. Watch for the choice of words:

Here's my deal...

I quit posting on FR after the "purge..."

So I waded back into the murk that is FR right around election time - A good time to get back into it, I though.

I thought wrong. I recognized hardly anyone, and there was this new guy, GGG....As for Fichori, do we really care? Ho poses no threat to our person. He's a complete goofball who adds nothing to a single thread he's ever posted in over there. [Full disclosure: I just read this whole thread.] He's most likely a 30-something single guy, physically unattractive, socially retarded, with a grudge against the world because it didn't give him what he wanted at some point.... If I get around to it, I'll write an opus explaining how FR has turned to crap. Either that, or Fichori will copy and paste this paragraph to get me banned. Hey Fichori -

Hmmm what was that word he used there to describe a loyal Freeper? Uhhh.... I believe he just said socially "retarded"

There you have it. Mods. I told you he was phoney, was baiting the discussion and he was baiting you too. I'll leave it to you to deal with him

Ol' ugly banned balrog666 was certainly happy to have Whattajoke back over to Darwin Central. Coyoteman still sounds pissed and like he's got a touch of IBS over there. Licking his scabies too no doubt.

124 posted on 10/24/2009 3:38:29 PM PDT by Agamemnon (Intelligent Design is to evolution what the Swift Boat Vets were to the Kerry campaign)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

On another thread: Did you see the article posted on “Lucy’s” diet and teeth?


125 posted on 10/24/2009 3:40:49 PM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

“This is precisely why the more education you get from our leftist universities, the more like you are to vote for Obama, or believe darwood’s evo-religious creation myth.”

It could also be that at Christian private schools, the education you get in sciences - especially if they teach literal Genesis as science - is simply inadequate and the students are not equipped to understand, much less agree with complex scientific theories.

I don’t think you’d find a correlation between “real” academic majors that require rigor and hard work and your Obama voters. I think that sort of ignorance is part of non-rigorous colleges and fields of study. I think that it is very difficult to obtain a rigorous science education at a Christian-based school if they stick to literal Biblical concepts, so in that way the average Christian school college graduate is more inline with the average college-educated Obama voter.

of course, my statements are just as unproven as yours.


126 posted on 10/24/2009 3:48:59 PM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: count-your-change

Which one are you talking about?


127 posted on 10/24/2009 3:49:45 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

This:

Ancient ‘Lucy’ Species Ate A Different Diet Than Previously Thought
Saturday, October 24, 2009 12:30:08 AM · by SunkenCiv · 10 replies · 359+ views
PhysOrg.com ^ | October 22nd, 2009 | University of Arkansas


128 posted on 10/24/2009 4:01:09 PM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Agamemnon

Its not Chuck Norris that the cowardly troublemakers from thither swampland are checking under their peat bogs for.

I can’t help but laugh at the claims on that thread that I’m ‘unattractive/overweight/retarded/etc.’

The ‘overweight’ jab still gives me much mirth. (I have a BMI of ~20.1)


129 posted on 10/24/2009 4:03:03 PM PDT by Fichori ('Wee-Weed Up' pitchfork wielding neolithic caveman villager with lit torch. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
I just checked your posting history, and you have variously referred to Creaionists and IDers as insane, stupid, dolts, idiots, fundies, dumbasses, goofballs, rampage shooters, and...drumroll please...”SOCIALLY RETARDED.”

Rampage shooters? Not sure what that was about... And I take that one back. There is no correlation and I apologize. But the others are apt. Please note, drumroll please... "Socially retarded" contains the descriptor "socially" which purposely connotes something else entirely. I stand by that as well.

does the PC rulebook exempt you from the prohibition from saying such things if you have (or claim to have) a special needs son?

Yes, it does. Sort of like how you (or those with similar beliefs as you) can condemn Catholics or perhaps even other types of Christians but if a non-Christian does, it's different. Get it? As for your wildly disturbing, incredibly insulting, and pathetically un-Christian supposition that I'm somehow lying about my son, if you took a moment to read replies WRITTEN DIRECTLY TO YOU less than a week ago instead of focusing on spamming FR constantly, perhaps you'd find it within your "loving" heart to have a bit of compassion.

Just because you lie on a daily basis and just because you are incapable of that love you profess to have for others, doesn't mean everyone else engages in such practices as well.

You completely and utterly disgust me. What is wrong with you?
130 posted on 10/24/2009 4:04:57 PM PDT by whattajoke (Let's keep Conservatism real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: john in springfield

Oh well, it was nice while it lasted.


131 posted on 10/24/2009 4:08:11 PM PDT by john in springfield (One has to belong to the intelligentsia to believe such things.No ordinary man could be such a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Agamemnon

I’m not sure what planet you are from, but on my planet “Socially retarded” is very different than using “retarded” as a pejorative.

What is wrong with you? I can’t think of a worse “advertisement” for your brand of Christianity than you. Not only that, you whine and cry to the mods like a 4 year old. Why? What went wrong in your life?

At the very least, I hope you ask for forgiveness next time you pray.


132 posted on 10/24/2009 4:09:38 PM PDT by whattajoke (Let's keep Conservatism real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: whattajoke

For what it’s worth, I too do not understand “Christians” who use every opportunity to treat others in ways that would make the devil blush.


133 posted on 10/24/2009 4:12:49 PM PDT by john in springfield (One has to belong to the intelligentsia to believe such things.No ordinary man could be such a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: john in springfield
Oh well, it was nice while it lasted.

Sorry, John. I tried to control myself but some here pushed a very personal button and I had to react. I've said my piece, some of which was rightfully removed by the mods, and I'm done.

Interesting post.
134 posted on 10/24/2009 4:13:36 PM PDT by whattajoke (Let's keep Conservatism real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

The funny thing about that thread, is it started out as a welcome thread.

I didn’t know about it until I was alerted to it by a DCer after it was pretty much winding down.

Of course, all the good threads got moved into their, um, members only ‘bash/troll FR’ forum. (they got caught with their skivvies down one too many times, ya know)


135 posted on 10/24/2009 4:19:02 PM PDT by Fichori ('Wee-Weed Up' pitchfork wielding neolithic caveman villager with lit torch. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: whattajoke

Sorry, no time to read. As you might have guessed, I started another thread while you were writing your diatribe. All the best :o)

—GGG


136 posted on 10/24/2009 4:33:44 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Wacka; GodGunsGuts; Orestes5711
I noticed your [sic.] and your minions trend of using “retreads” when you meant to use the word “retards”.

Yeah, "evo-retard" works for you and that whattajoke of a "PhD" you allegedly have when you don't even know that peer reviewed journals are magazines! A "retread" you may be too, and if true that is sure to come out in time. If and when it does, it won’t be pretty.

I often have the privilege of sniffing your types out in both academic and corporate research institutions and have had the pleasure of showing a few of your academic pretender-buddies to the door.

They're the ones who likely finished an online PhD at some institution they found advertised on the back of a match book, and are generally revealed by serial practical and conceptual incompetencies. Or maybe they're people who started in a PhD program and never finished their thesis, because they washed out. Many of these are as personally compromised as they are intellectually inept and can be found stealing others research and claiming it as their own, or blaming their screw-ups on others.

You remind me a lot of another poster who calls himself some sort of scientist – “Electric Strawballs” -- or something like that. Doesn't know the difference between myosin, Myocin, and -mycin. He's probably got a GRE, and likely works as a 3rd shift glassware jocky in a groundwater testing lab someplace.

What flushes you out in these discussions is that you have yet to demonstrate that you even know what are the basic, and most rudimentary tools of scientific research. You come across completely unstudied and intellectually lazy.

As for your intellectual gurus: an un-accomplished, non-formally scientifically trained medical school drop-out, racist, and failed theologian wanna be -- Darwin -- who was championed by his equally racist, misogynistic "bulldog" sidekick and contemporary mouthpiece, Tommy Huxley -- academically accomplished in NO discipline whatsoever. Wow, now there's some intellectual heft! (/sarc)

But still there they are: your intellectual gurus -- you, a supposed PhD -- and credentials like Darwin's and Bulldog are credible enough for you to form a cognitive foundation upon their laughable premises and then upon which you have then chosen to base your "scientific," religious, and philosophical world-view.

Somehow even "evo-tard" is a term entirely too kind, especially for some of those banned Darwin Central drama queens.

So far you just sound like little more than another one of those wash outs cruising for that intellectual pink-slip of life. Darwin Central is populated with enough of them already. Maybe you'd like to join them like ol' "whattajackass" did.

137 posted on 10/24/2009 6:08:29 PM PDT by Agamemnon (Intelligent Design is to evolution what the Swift Boat Vets were to the Kerry campaign)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Agamemnon

My goodness. That was epic. Thank you.


138 posted on 10/24/2009 6:12:59 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Agamemnon; Wacka

Feel the love! Agamemnon’s “witnessing” is truly a blessing! What a beacon of light!

Your rather ample supply of anger and venom is quite startling. Your seething post seems to point to a failed academic career. (Your creationism confirms that.)

I don’t know what went wrong in your life, nor will I even guess, but I hope you find peace someday.


139 posted on 10/24/2009 6:15:45 PM PDT by whattajoke (Let's keep Conservatism real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Agamemnon

Why such hate in your heart to those that disagree with you?

Why resort to name calling?

Why not post scientific proof to back up your points instead?


140 posted on 10/24/2009 7:11:01 PM PDT by Wacka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 441-453 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson