Why such hate in your heart to those that disagree with you?
Why resort to name calling?
Why not post scientific proof to back up your points instead?
I disagree with cheap imitations, especially when they call themselves conservatives or scientists.
Why resort to name calling?
The only ones who complain are those who come to the inescapable conclusion that my forward smash beats their flaccid backhand any day. You think you can dish it out without consequence but shrivel like cowardly scalded mutts when the field isn't yours anymore (as if it ever was).
Why not post scientific proof to back up your points instead?
I debate scientists from peer reviewed scientific literature all the time. You aren't familiar enough with what peer-reviewed literature is to even know how it is vetted, published, or even how it is even made available.
I'll wager you have never cracked open a peer-reviewed journal on your own in your entire life. Sorry, reading the thumb-worn Highlights in the dentist office waiting room might be more your speed, but if that's the closest you've come to what you might think passes for peer-reviewed literature, well....
When you have been presented with peer-reviewed literature right here on FR to comment upon as a cogent scientist, but you are too lazy to digest it, and you lack the innate curiosity of a true scientist to acquaint your self with the particulars of the scientific debate that surrounds a given topic.
Dr. Walt Brown (PhD, Mechanical Engineering, MIT) writes a 350 page book richly sourced from peer-reviewed literature across a multitude of scientific disciplines, now in its 8th edition and also freely available on the internet, and all your lazy stupid ass can say is "a book by an engineer on creation biology is not proof." Brown doesn't set out to prove anything, but lets the discussion go in the logical direction that only an objective study of science will take it.
But see, I don't believe you are an objective scientist. In fact I don't happen to be convinced by anything you have even posted on FR that you are a scientist at all let alone capable of holding a PhD in anything -- at least not from any reputable institution.
Maybe all you are is just another Sally Struthers success story. You certainly appear to reason and write at that level.
Your Catholicism as you have stated it is not Christianity. From another earlier thread from about a month or so ago:
‘I don’t have to be “born again”. I was born once and that’s all I need to go to heaven.”
Jesus on the other hand clearly said,”In reply Jesus declared, "I tell you the truth, no one can see the kingdom of God unless he is born again." (John 3:3)
So who’s telling the truth here Jesus or Wacka?
You again:
“I believe that all the Jews, Hindus, Sikhs, animists, Wiccans, etc, and even atheists that live good lives will go to heaven. They will find that their view was incorrect, but they will be there.”
Jesus on the other hand says, “ Jesus answered, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. (John 14:6)
So who’s telling the truth here, Jesus or Wacka?
You again: "[I am] A proud Catholic (that means Christian too)".
You again, same thread: “As a [sic.] “atheistic liberal” I’m not going to church.”
So who’s telling the truth here, Wacka, or……..Wacka?
You will continue to be ridiculed and called out because you are untruthful.
I suspect you are no more truthful about your Christianity than you are about your supposed "PhD."
You write like neither a scientist nor a Christian.