Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The following banner appears above the article.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic


___________________________________________________________


___________________________________________________________

June, 1970 -- Kerry joins Vietnam Veterans Against the War (VVAW), a national veterans group that is part of the Peoples Coalition for Peace and Justice. The PCPJ is a broad coalition of local and national organizations, including the Communist Party, USA, "committed to conducting demonstrations aimed at ending the war in Indochina, and poverty, racism and injustice at home." The VVAW, CCI and PCPJ all have headquarters at 156 Fifth Avenue in New York City. VVAW Executive Secretary Al Hubbard, a former Black Panther, is also on the coordinating committee of the PCPJ. Hubbard soon appoints Kerry to the VVAW's Executive Committee, bypassing the normal election process.
http://www.wintersoldier.com/index.php?topic=Timeline
___________________________________________________________

Photobucket

"Shortly after taking office in 1985, Kerry and Senator Tom Harkin of Iowa went on a fact-finding trip to Nicaragua, where they met with Daniel Ortega (right) and other Sandinistas. The trip was criticized when the Sandinistas cemented ties with Moscow."

http://www.boston.com/globe/nation/packages/kerry/062003.shtml

1 posted on 10/23/2009 7:40:09 AM PDT by ETL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ETL
The United States on Thursday expressed concern about a Nicaraguan court ruling that opens the way for leftist President Daniel Ortega to seek re-election in the 2011 election.

However, when the Honduran Supreme Court put the kebosh to Zemlaya trying a similar stunt, the US found fault with that as well. Do ya think, guys, that you might, just might have emboldened the leftists in Nicaragua by doing that?

2 posted on 10/23/2009 7:42:31 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ETL

Daniel the Molester has accomplished in Nicaragua what the Honduran Congress stopped Mel Zelaya from accomplishing there. So the “US concern” strikes me as more than a little disingenuous. And Kerry has the judgment of a gerbil.


3 posted on 10/23/2009 7:42:52 AM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ETL
The United States on Thursday expressed concern about a Nicaraguan court ruling that opens the way for leftist President Daniel Ortega to seek re-election in the 2011 election.

Wait a second. Aren't we the same country putting the hammer to Honduras for their courts and congress upholding their constitution against a president illegally trying to see reelection?

4 posted on 10/23/2009 7:44:25 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Soon everyone will win a Nobel Peace Prize for not being George Bush...well, except for George Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ETL

Well gee, maybe we shouldn’t have encouraged him by harrassing Honduras over virtually the same thing.


6 posted on 10/23/2009 7:49:47 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ETL

This is exactly why Honduras put strict term limits in its constitution. This is a big time “teachable moment”.

And of course the Obama administration’s response is glaringly, ridiculously inconsistent. What a bunch of idiots.


7 posted on 10/23/2009 7:51:33 AM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ETL

8 posted on 10/23/2009 7:51:56 AM PDT by traumer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ETL

9 posted on 10/23/2009 7:54:13 AM PDT by traumer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

You know what they say about pictures and words!

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

11 posted on 10/23/2009 7:58:21 AM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ETL

What was the basis of the court ruling? Was it against the constitution for a president to run again? Did they have a limitation like we do on presidents not having more than two terms?


12 posted on 10/23/2009 8:01:56 AM PDT by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson