Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne

Read post number 6


17 posted on 10/22/2009 2:24:01 PM PDT by William Tell 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: William Tell 2

I saw it. Could be I’m all wet, that’s still my take on it. The article just didn’t make a connection with me. Not being a full-time fan certainly plays into it I’m sure.

I appreciate the mention, because I realize this is an issue where people can differ, and I think Philly fans and particularly this guy are certainly going to differ. After all, they’re more knowledgeable about the team than I am.

The writer lost me when he tried to weave in a Field of Dreams moment. That I most certainly don’t see. Other similarities to the old team probably would have had more sway with me without that.


19 posted on 10/22/2009 2:33:05 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Deficit spending, trade deficits, unsecure mortages, worthless paper... ... not a problem. Oh yeah?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: William Tell 2; DoughtyOne
The Field of Dreams reference did register with me as I think there's some aesthetic similarities between what the 29-31’ fans and current fans are experiencing. From the clutch hitting, to a manager who often relied on gut instinct, to the uncertain the economic times. When I watch this team, it feels so similar to the stories my grandfather used to tell me about watching the 29-31’ Athletics.

One other striking similarity is that both the 29’ Athletics and 2008 Phils used a pitcher (Ehmke-Athletics, Moyer-Phils)who was in their mid 40’s. I mean how often do you see 44 year olds pitching in the World Series!
GO PHILS!!!

21 posted on 10/22/2009 3:46:01 PM PDT by 07Jack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson