Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress is planning to make your home unsalable
email | 10/22.2009 | By Craig J. Cantoni

Posted on 10/22/2009 11:29:02 AM PDT by hsmomx3

In the midst of the raging healthcare debate over who owns your body and can decide what repairs it receives, the media and the public have overlooked the fact that the U.S. House of Representatives has already ruled in H.R. 2454 that the state owns your house and can decide what repairs it receives. Your name might be on the title, the mortgage, the homeowners policy, and the property tax bill, but if H.R. 2454 becomes the law of the land, the federal government will become a dictatorial homeowners association (HOA) with the power to make your house unsalable unless you comply with its diktats.

H.R. 2454 is the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009. Its sponsor is the creepiest-looking member of the House, Henry Waxman (D-CA), who resembles Heinrich Himmler in appearance but certainly not in ideology -- well, except for Waxman’s belief in statism, central planning, one-party control, and the subjugation of the individual to the collective.

The Act is 1,428 pages long. I strongly encourage you to read every page. By doing so, you’ll get an education in political science, economics, and history that will be better than a PhD in these subjects. You’ll not only understand how nations destroy themselves from within, but you’ll also understand how politicians like Waxman, and the people who elect them, are turning the U.S. economy into an economy of high-paid consultants, lawyers, lobbyists, and apparatchiks. At the same time, these great intellects bemoan that high-paying jobs for working stiffs are evaporating. Connecting dots is not their forte.

The Act can be found at:

http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=111_cong_bills&docid=f:h2454pcs.txt.pdf

Warning: You’re going to find a lot of gobbledygook like this:

(b) APPRAISER CERTIFICATION AND LICENSING REQUIREMENTS.--Section 1116 of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (12 U.S.C. 3345) is amended--

(1) in subsection (a), by inserting before the period at the end of the following: “, and meets the requirements established pursuant to subsection (f) for qualifications regarding consideration of any renewable energy sources for, or energy efficiency or energy-conserving improvements or features of, the property” . . .

Such gobbledygook will ensure that thousands of young Americans who might have pursued careers in science or engineering will instead pursue careers as gobbledygook interpreters -- as lawyers, consultants, and bureaucrats. It’s hard to imagine that a sane person would want to attend college for four years and then law school for another three years in order to spend his life deciphering the meaning of a confusing clause before a period in subsection (a) of 12 U.S.C. 3345.

Speaking of sanity, it’s impossible for a sane person to read 1,428 pages of such tripe and still be sane afterwards and know for sure what the Act says. As such, my interpretation of what the Act says about your house might not be accurate, because I’m typing this in a padded cell with drool dripping off my chin. In any event, the following is what I think it says about your house.

It says that the federal government, in conjunction with state and local governments, will set environmental standards and building codes for residential homes. Then, any major renovation or planned sale of a house will trigger a report to the authorities on whether it meets the standards. Such information will be maintained in a national database and reflected in real estate records, including titles and property tax records.

In other words, if your house doesn’t meet the standards, this will become public information available to prospective buyers, who would have to be as stupid as Henry Waxman to buy a substandard house and risk the possibility that the government will someday force them to bring it up to standard. The Act’s language doesn’t preclude that possibility.

Of course, the expense of such renovations will be borne by you, unless you’re in a favored socioeconomic or racial group, in which case the expense will be borne by others. For example, if you live in a manufactured home (mobile home) that was manufactured prior to 1976, and if your household income is less than twice the poverty rate, you can get a rebate of up to $7,500 on the purchase of a new manufactured home that meets the standards. And if your race is “diverse,” owners of multifamily housing properties with more than 50 units will be required to make room for you in order to meet the environmental standards. Maybe some races produce less CO2 than other races.

Although the Act’s language doesn’t say it as explicitly as I’m going to say it, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will be pressured under the Act to give favorable terms to mortgages for Green homes. Also, to be eligible for free stuff under the Act, contractors will have pay prevailing wages, or, in other words, will have to share the loot with union friends of the Democrat Party.

The good news in all of this is that your home will still be your castle. The bad news is that if it doesn’t have thermal windows, a reflective roof, thick insulation, and the proper appliances and heating and air-conditioning systems, you’ll be living in it until you die, unless you can afford to bring it up to the standards in order to sell it.

But none of this is what made me insane. What put me over the edge was the section in the Act on trees. Yes, the federal government wants to set national standards on trees in your yard.

The Act will establish a program to “use the best available science to create tree siting guidelines which dictate [well, at least they admit it] where the optimum tree species are best planted in locations that achieve maximum reductions in consumer energy demand while causing the least disruption to public infrastructure, considering overhead and underground facilities.” It goes on, of course, to specify that free trees will be available under the program. It also specifies that loot will be given to power companies to be shared with nonprofit tree-planting organizations.

I have to end here. An orderly is entering my padded cell to wipe the drool off my chin and change my diaper. Let me quickly close with this: The most insane aspect of the Act is that it is not needed -- not its 1,428 words, not its legions of lawyers, not its brigades of bureaucrats, and not its tremendous shift of productive resources to unproductive make-work. If the consensus in the United States is that global warming is man-caused and can be stopped -- as wrongheaded as that is -- it is not necessary for the government to micromanage your life to the extent that it tells you what trees to plant in your yard. Instead, the government would only have to raise energy prices through a tax on carbon, and the market and individual choices would sort out the rest.

But what do I know? I’m insane.

_______________


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 111th; agenda; cwii; democrats; donttreadonme; economy; housing; lping; rapeofliberty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: hsmomx3
Such gobbledygook will ensure that thousands of young Americans who might have pursued careers in science or engineering will instead pursue careers as gobbledygook interpreters -- as lawyers, consultants, and bureaucrats.
Seems to be overly redundant to me.
All those careers were downsized and outsourced by the previous administration's "free trade" policies anyway.
21 posted on 10/22/2009 11:51:21 AM PDT by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoadTest
Either this is the United States of America or it’s not. Decide.

The people have decided this. They put dem leftists in power.

22 posted on 10/22/2009 11:51:31 AM PDT by umgud (I couldn't understand why the ball kept getting bigger......... then it hit me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3

It’s no big deal anyway.

I mean really...when the Dollar goes belly up and Zimbabwian hyperinflation hits the Ol’ USofA, even if you COULD sell your house, you’d still only get $3.27 for it.

Hey! Come to think of it... That’s even more than my house is worth right NOW!


23 posted on 10/22/2009 11:52:56 AM PDT by moovova (More coffee please...make it a double.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3
Absent anything else, given “prospective buyers, who would have to be as stupid as Henry Waxman to buy a substandard house and risk the possibility that the government will someday force them to bring it up to standard” then you can't sell the property unless you reduce the selling price enough to make up for the risk to the buyer. Lot's of people reducing the selling price of their homes will bring down real estate values. Lower real estate values mean lower real estate tax revenue to local governments.

Local government won't like that.

And now for something different. When I spell checked this the first time, every word was indicated as misspelled. When I backed out and tried again, it was OK. I wonder what that was about.

24 posted on 10/22/2009 11:54:12 AM PDT by KrisKrinkle (Blessed be those who know the depth and breadth of their ignorance. Cursed be those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beebuster2000

I have “word web” on my computer. It says “Impossible to sell” is the defination.


25 posted on 10/22/2009 11:55:48 AM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin (Waste and fraud are synonymous with gov't spending)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Puppage
unsalable

I think it means that which can't be sold. Not a good thing.

26 posted on 10/22/2009 11:56:05 AM PDT by Shannon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3

Another shot in the Cold Civil War..of the DC Beltwaypubbiecrats against America.


27 posted on 10/22/2009 11:57:18 AM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3
Let's see, in the midwest, evergreens on the north, maple or large leaf oak on the west, short trees (maybe a dogwood, redbud, or crabapple), or none, on the south, and same for the east.

I mean, c'mon, how hard can it be?

28 posted on 10/22/2009 11:57:34 AM PDT by Just another Joe (Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3

Self to Congress: “STICK IT!”


29 posted on 10/22/2009 11:57:36 AM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin

word web doesnt give you the medical meaning. look it up again.


30 posted on 10/22/2009 11:59:10 AM PDT by beebuster2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: sr4402
"The Bill basically says you have to have an OK by a Green inspector"

If Green Inspectors do not exist yet - the bill not having been passed - can I be prosecuted for calling on everyone to kill a Green Inspector for Christmas?

31 posted on 10/22/2009 12:03:34 PM PDT by I am Richard Brandon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: beebuster2000

No it doesn’t give the medical term just the common one.


32 posted on 10/22/2009 12:05:24 PM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin (Waste and fraud are synonymous with gov't spending)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3

Do you mean “saleable’?


33 posted on 10/22/2009 12:07:22 PM PDT by Irish Queen (This world is not my home, I'm just a passing through ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3

The ultimate goal is for the government to control all financial transactions. This would include the sale of houses. They can’t seize total control just yet, so they are happy, for how, with this.


34 posted on 10/22/2009 12:07:41 PM PDT by Leftism is Mentally Deranged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldexpat
...so why do we suddenly need to build a house to artic or death valley standards?

Why?

Because your Liberal betters have decreed it to be so!

Yours is not to question!!!!

Off to reeducation camp with him! The insolent insect!

Let this be a lesson to you, FRiend!

CA....

35 posted on 10/22/2009 12:08:32 PM PDT by Chances Are (Whew! It seems I've at last found that silly grin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3

This is on the order of *asbestos* *lead paint* etc., Just be thankful our houses are not listed as *historical landmarks* as in the UK, where ownership of land does not guarantee that the *owner* can build a home without approval for every nook & cranny - or improve an existing building if it listed with the National Trust.

It’s almost as if the Queen still owns the whole kit & kaboodle in the UK and almost as if the Federal Gubmint is the US landlord from sea to shining sea.


36 posted on 10/22/2009 12:12:06 PM PDT by sodpoodle (Never give up- Keep Up!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sr4402

This is probably being pushed by certain segments of the home building industry, certainly by the subcontractors. They would love the government to mandate that you buy a new furnace, A/C, water heater, roof, windows, etc...

Just like the refrigeration industry was all for the ban on R12 freon; everyone had to buy new refrigeration units.


37 posted on 10/22/2009 12:14:19 PM PDT by henkster (0bamanomics: The "Final Solution" to America's "Prosperity Question.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3
"Congress is planning to make your home unsalable"

Once again, ask the Brits about this. Idiot Brown has tried this over in nthe UK. You couldn't sell a house because there were not enough inspectors and the law said you could not START the sale process until you were certified!. Then along came the inspector to 'help' you!

I sometimes think that the UK and the USA governments are watching each other "Didn't work for you. Bet I can do it better!"

38 posted on 10/22/2009 12:15:23 PM PDT by I am Richard Brandon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3
H.R. 2454 is the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009. Its sponsor is the creepiest-looking member of the House, Henry Waxman (D-CA), who resembles Heinrich Himmler in appearance,

He looks more like Mr. Potato Head. LOL


39 posted on 10/22/2009 12:17:13 PM PDT by NRA2BFree (If there is trouble let it be in my life time so I donÂ’t leave it for the kids to clean up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin

ok fine, you got me. yeah i made it all up.
salable isnt a medical term for “dry mouth”.

but it was kinda funny.


40 posted on 10/22/2009 12:18:11 PM PDT by beebuster2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson