Skip to comments.
Victor Davis Hanson: The Kitty-Cat Who Roared - The loud reformer Obama himself proves even...
National Review Online ^
| October 22, 2009
| Victor Davis Hanson
Posted on 10/22/2009 9:59:21 AM PDT by neverdem
October 22, 2009, 0:00 a.m.
The Kitty-Cat Who Roared The loud reformer Obama himself proves even emptier in his promises than Bush.
By Victor Davis Hanson
President Obama keeps roaring out deadlines like a lion — only later to meow like a little kitty.
Remember, for example, how he bellowed to cheering partisan crowds that he would close down the detainment facility at Guantanamo within a year?
The clock ticks — and Guantanamo isn’t close to being shut down. It once was easy for candidate Obama to deplore George W. Bush’s supposed gulag. Now it proves harder to decide between the bad choice of detaining non-uniformed terrorist combatants and the worse ones of letting them go, giving them civilian trials, or deporting them to unwilling hosts.
Going back further to September 2007, candidate Obama postured about Iraq that he wanted “to immediately begin to remove our combat troops. Not in six months or one year — now!”
That “now!” sure sounded macho.
On Iraq, candidate Obama also railed that "the American people have had enough of the shifting spin. We've had enough of extended deadlines for benchmarks that go unmet."
Talk about “unmet” deadlines and “spin” — here we are in October 2009, and there are still 120,000 U.S. troops in Iraq. The reason why Obama fudged on his promised deadline is that the surge in 2007 worked. American deaths plummeted. The theater is quiet. Iraqi democracy is still there after six years. Obama cannot quite admit these facts, but on the other hand, he does not want to be responsible for undermining them.
This July, our president roared out another impending deadline. He warned Iran that it had to prove its compliance with non-proliferation protocols by September — or face new consequences since the U.S. was not going to “wait indefinitely.”
Now it’s October, and even the French are exasperated that Obama still sounds like the king of the jungle but acts like a purring house kitten. And no wonder that Iran and its patron Russia seem to be calculating that Obama will figure that a nuclear Iran is less troubling for him than the consequences of offending Vladimir Putin, spiking oil prices or using force in the volatile Middle East.
The list of differences between what the melodramatic Obama threatens or promises to do and what he actually does is endless.
Health care: The president once warned Congress that it had to pass comprehensive reform by the August congressional recess. August came and went, and now we’re still waiting, waiting, waiting . . . .
Afghanistan: This was once Obama’s promised war to win — the one we had to refocus on after supposedly taking our eye off the ball to fight in Iraq. Now, instead, we are suddenly blaming the eight-year-old Karzai government for not being the stable partner we need to finish the job.
Ethics reform: During the campaign, Obama vowed to end lobbyists in government, post legislation on the Internet five days before a presidential signing, and air health-care negotiations on C-SPAN.
In short, just imagine if Obama were to warn Congress to get health-care done by November 15 — or else; or to give Iran one last chance until the first of the year to stop enriching uranium; or to promise that Guantanamo really, really will close on March 1, 2010. Would anyone take him seriously, much less fret about the consequences of ignoring those vows?
Obama ran on the accusation that Bush missed promised targets and deadlines. Yet when the loud reformer Obama himself proves even emptier in his promises than Bush, he suffers from theatrical hypocrisy, too.
But there is an even greater problem. Overheated rhetoric got Obama into these jams — and he seems to expect that his dramatic flair can always get him out as well. So we all await more of the empty hope-and-change hocus-pocus — as Obama explains how he never really promised to get out of Iraq “now!” or to “take further steps” against Iran in September 2009.
When Jan. 1, 2010, comes and goes, I expect the president to say that, “I can no more shut down Guantanamo than I can . . . .”
Well, by now you know the rest of what follows. — Victor Davis Hanson is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution and a recipient of the 2007 National Humanities Medal. © 2009 Tribune Media Services, Inc.
|
|
TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections; Russia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: gitmo; guantanamo; iran; iraq; obama; vdh; victordavishanson
1
posted on
10/22/2009 9:59:21 AM PDT
by
neverdem
To: Tolik
2
posted on
10/22/2009 10:02:16 AM PDT
by
neverdem
(Xin loi minh oi)
To: neverdem
Now it proves harder to decide between the bad choice of detaining non-uniformed terrorist combatants and the worse ones of letting them go, giving them civilian trials, or deporting them to unwilling hosts.How about just shooting them and feeding them to sharks?
3
posted on
10/22/2009 10:04:32 AM PDT
by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: neverdem
Obammy is an empty suit. He's also a bag of hot air.
Words, words and more words, but no brains and no convictions except his own narcissism.
He may not even be an empty suit, because the emperor is not wearing any clothes.
4
posted on
10/22/2009 10:05:29 AM PDT
by
garyhope
(It's World War IV, right here, right now, courtesy of Islam.)
To: neverdem
5
posted on
10/22/2009 10:17:28 AM PDT
by
beethovenfan
(If Islam is the solution, the "problem" must be freedom.)
To: neverdem
6
posted on
10/22/2009 10:19:14 AM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
To: neverdem
Obama figures he has lied to get into a mess and he'll lie to get out of it. And it might work because the mainstream public either doesn't know or doesn't care.
To: neverdem
Our enemies do not fear him, our allies do not trust him. This is Barack Obama.
8
posted on
10/22/2009 10:26:09 AM PDT
by
jveritas
(God Bless our brave troops)
To: Secret Agent Man
Big "Boy" Chair?
9
posted on
10/22/2009 10:29:55 AM PDT
by
Jeff Chandler
(Hear us, O Bama: Mmm, mmm, mmm.)
To: neverdem
You have to consider VDH's credentials vs Obama's. I mean, What's a National Humanities Medal compared to a Nobel peace prize?
To: neverdem
The only promises he keeps are the one’s that limit our freedom.
To: DuncanWaring
“How about just shooting them and feeding them to sharks?”
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Cruelty to the sharks, don’t you know? Can’t have that now, can we?
12
posted on
10/22/2009 10:54:58 AM PDT
by
RipSawyer
(Trying to reason with a leftist is like trying to catch sunshine in a fish net at midnight.)
To: neverdem
So we are to conclude the opposite of what he tells us, right?
In addition to the myriad of examples in VDH's article, I WARN you about this one...
95% of American's will not see their taxes raised...
Yeah...you guessed it...95% WILL see their taxes raised (and that STILL won't be enough)
If it wasn't for the sheer destructive path he's leading us down, his presidency would be laughable...
Now? The Obama Presidency is simply dangerous to our future.
I'd be happy if he'd at least announce "present" these days....it's more than he has been doing so far....
13
posted on
10/22/2009 10:56:58 AM PDT
by
NorCoGOP
(Recession: friend loses his job. Depression: You lose your job. Recovery: Obama loses his job.)
To: DuncanWaring
How about just shooting them and feeding them to sharks?Because that would be a waste of bullets.
14
posted on
10/22/2009 11:03:01 AM PDT
by
whd23
To: neverdem
He’s a liar, a pathological liar.
15
posted on
10/22/2009 12:21:03 PM PDT
by
RoadTest
( But when ye pray, use not vain repetitions, as the heathen do)
To: DuncanWaring
“How about just shooting them and feeding them to sharks?”
How about we auction off tickets to be one of those who get to shoot them. Or maybe a raffle, as I could afford one $2 ticket, but I'd get outbid if we ebay them...
Who knows, maybe we could recoup the TARP funds?
16
posted on
10/22/2009 1:02:51 PM PDT
by
Old Student
(We have a name for the people who think indiscriminate killing is fine. They're called "The Bad Guys)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson